First of all, it is necessary to explain the distribution of more than 70 articles, which can be divided into two situations: one is that there are many names in front, and the other is the newsletter or the first author's article.
First, there are many nominal articles, so we can't say that teachers have strong academic ability, but the relationship is definitely good, or they have certain rights, and they have to hang up under power. Generally speaking, either participate in more work, handle the relationship well, be named, or be a leader, and the following teachers exist in name only.
Second, if he is the first author, or a correspondent who has published more than 70 articles, the teacher must be academically accomplished. As far as the teacher's doctoral degree is concerned, doctors graduate at the age of 30, which is equivalent to 10 articles per year after work, and the number is really large. In this case, there are two situations, one is low-quality articles, that is, irrigation, which is not advocated by the scientific research community. However, many teachers are qualified because of the pressure of scientific research and life. After all, it is not easy to irrigate ten articles a year. Assuming high-quality articles, there is no doubt that the teacher is a great academic figure, producing 10 high-level articles a year, or at least an academic star.
Assuming that you apply for a tutor, only from the academic level, it is recommended to choose the second kind of tutor, whether it is irrigation or high-level journals, it is worth applying for.
The key is what his innovation is, regardless of how many SCI papers are published.
Hello, young college teachers come to answer questions.
As a 40-year-old teacher, being able to publish so many articles does have certain skills. So, how to evaluate a person's scientific research ability through articles?
First, the number of articles. There is no doubt that more is better than less. Only when the number of articles increases can thoughts be systematized. The number of articles is an evaluation premise.
Second, the quality of the article. This involves factors such as influencing factors. The higher the article impact factor, the higher the proof quality. And the number of citations in the article. The higher the number of citations, the greater the influence of the proof article.
Third, the ideological development path of the article. Looking at a person's scientific research results, we can see the change of his views and personal growth. Quantity and quality are appearances, and the path of ideological development is fundamental.
Looking at the quantity alone, there is no problem at all; If the influence factor is still high, it shows that the author's ideological development path is scientific and perfect. Of course, this is an ideal situation. The rest can be combined with the above answer points and analyzed one by one.
The above is my little experience, I hope it will help you.
It can't be measured by the number of articles, but by the quality of the papers.
You can have a rest. Life is more than just writing papers. [Yi tooth] [Yi tooth] [Yi tooth]
See how long teachers in their forties have been doing scientific research. You are going to take a PhD examination for forty people, and you can only enter the university for your own scientific research at the age of forty. How much time can you have to hand out so many papers?
If you write it yourself, there are more than 70 articles, which is already a lot. If it exists in name only, hehe! The academic level is not the number of articles, but the quality, even if it is a cow.
Not much.
I send more than 30 articles a year.
Now is not the time to look at the quantity, but also the quality of the article.
If they are all important journals and have made important contributions, it must be a lot. If it is nominal, there is nothing to say.