In the era of continuous progress, there are more and more occasions where speeches can be used. A speech is a manuscript prepared in advance by participants in order to express their opinions or report their ideological work at meetings or important activities. You always can't write a speech? The following is my carefully organized speech on the debate, hoping to help you.

Debate speech 1 Dear leading teachers,

I am very happy to join you in this competitive and dynamic debate venue. It's really "infinite scenery with dangerous peaks"! Rather than enjoying the debate, it is better to taste the wisdom feast of culture and thought; Rather than enjoying the debate, I am listening to a wonderful educational campaign. My mind was attracted by the broad ideas and sharp words of the players. In listening and thinking, we capture the wisdom of the players in the collision and absorb the brilliance reflected by the players in the confrontation. I can't comment, just want to share my three feelings with you:

Feeling 1: This landscape is full of enterprising energy. Why do you say that? The first is a stadium with theoretical support and experience. Teachers condense their usual thinking into a rich ideological feast, so that boring and incomprehensible educational theories can enter the hearts of ordinary teachers from the unattainable sacred desks. Secondly, it is a learning field that turns confusion into thinking and problems into solutions. We saw the thinking process, judgment and reasoning, language charm and personality publicity of the players from both sides. Third, here is a magnetic field, where you can learn from others, experience excitement and enrich yourself in happiness. The contestants' knowledge contest, wisdom confrontation, talent evaluation and quality competition left a deep impression on everyone present. Fourth, it is a platform for combing educational thoughts and sharing educational ideas. Players' good mental outlook and keen thinking ability allow us to sort out the differences in ideas, recall the responsibilities of our teachers and renew the blood of ideas.

Feeling 2: This bloom is full of sparks of wisdom. The debate has come to an end, but the wonderful performance of the debater is still in our minds. The debaters on both sides can be said to be knowledgeable, ingenious, intelligent, arguing with each other and defending their own views. Our team and debaters basically grasped the "five degrees" in the competition:

(1) has a thickness in concept. Many teams accurately grasp the connotation and extension of the debate, understand their positions at multiple levels and from multiple angles, and have a thick conception. For example, the positive proposal: 1, the examination has a long history and has made outstanding contributions to social progress and development; 2. Examination evaluation has the advantages of scientificity, operability, fairness and justice; 3. At present, there is no evaluation method that can surpass the examination evaluation. In the absence of an optimal method, examination evaluation is a suboptimal scheme. According to the new curriculum concept, the opposing party also puts forward: 1, a multi-dimensional evaluation goal, which not only pays attention to the mastery of knowledge and skills, but also reflects the development of students' learning process, methods, emotions and values; 2. Diversified evaluation methods: combination of achievement and specialty, combination of oral test and practical operation, combination of academic achievement and growth record, and combination of summative evaluation and process evaluation; 3. Diversified evaluation topics. Students' self-evaluation, mutual evaluation and teachers' and parents' evaluation are combined to evaluate students' plans. 4. The examination is one-sided, single and absolute, with too much emphasis on screening and selection.

(2) The argument has breadth. Many teams have expanded their arguments in breadth and advanced them in depth. From ancient times to the present, from Baidu search to various reference books, from educational life to social phenomena, from individuals to the public, from theoretical knowledge to practical research, debaters from both sides have widely quoted and proved their arguments. The whole demonstration process is clear and clear, giving people a progressive aesthetic feeling.

(3) toughness in attack and defense. Some teams can grasp each other's key points when refuting questions, and the questions are simple and clear. Answering questions should be direct, reasonable and well-founded, and can resist debate.

(4) Have wisdom in debating skills. Debaters pay attention to skills in the process of debate, and the sparks of wisdom are constantly flashing. For example, the technique of "luring the snake out of the hole" was used in the first game. Counterparty: Do you only judge students by exams? Professor: Examinations are not the only way for us. Counterparty: since it is not, then admit that the exam has its one-sidedness, limitations and irrationality. Why use unreasonable evaluation of students? Why not give up? In this way, I set a trap, asked questions purposefully, and then grasped the flawed part of the other party's answer and put forward my own point of view.

Take another example: In the fourth game, the opponent used the trick of "playing hard": Zheng Fang: Excuse me, your opponent, aren't you all taking the exam organized by the teaching and research section now? Why do you say no? Counterparty: Before I left, I told my students that I would take part in this competition. The view is that students don't need to be evaluated by exams under the new curriculum. The student asked, what about winning? Aren't you going to take the exam? I said yes. Cheers rang out in the classroom at once. In this way, the other party's answer is enough to explain from the student level that there is no need for an exam, thus further expressing their views.

(5) willing to cooperate. The debaters of both sides have decent debate style, generous manners, standardized language, quick response, wit and humor, and decent conversation, which fully embodies their open thinking, rich knowledge and fighting spirit, and their good cultural accomplishment and demeanor. In this war of words, we not only watched the contest between knowledge and eloquence, but also appreciated the sparks of wisdom flashing everywhere.

Feeling 3: This wonderful flower must shine with dazzling colors. In this debate, although there are still some theoretical and technical deficiencies: for example, the concept is not novel enough, and the pros and cons are too entangled; The argument is not sufficient, and the explanation of why it is needed and why it is not needed is not sufficient; The attack and defense are not sharp enough to grasp the defects in the opponent's argument in time; Debate skills are not skilled enough, and sometimes they set obstacles for their own views; The cooperation is not perfect. Free debate has time, but I don't know how to use it. Nevertheless, we have seen everyone's active participation and confidence. Although there are still many contradictions in the evaluation of students' exams in the curriculum reform, there are still some discordant notes on this issue; Although there is still a long way to go to solve these problems, this debate should be said to have brought us a lot of enlightenment, which makes us stand on the commanding heights of how to evaluate students under the new curriculum. I think, as long as we grasp the correct view of talents, aim at students' all-round development and lifelong development, and treat every child with a developmental perspective, this wonderful flower of educational evaluation will be in bud and bloom with gorgeous colors. Although examination is the most important means in China's education evaluation at present, the appearance of students recommended by the principals of Peking University and Tsinghua and the exploration of the relative separation of enrollment and examination in the forthcoming Education Outline give us reason to expect that children under the new curriculum concept will not become containers full of knowledge, but will certainly bathe in more humanistic care; It will not become a machine for examination, and there will be a broad space for personality development.

Finally, I want to say thank you. Thank you for the active participation of XXXXXXXX, the wisdom of the contestants, the hard work of the judges, and the warm invitation and help of XXXXXXXX! Dear leading teachers, I'll see you at the next event feast!

Best debater (XX): XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Excellent debater (xx): xx

Award-winning results of teacher debate group:

Gold medal: xx

Silver Award: xxxxxx

Bronze Award: xxxxxxxxxxx

Debate Speech 2 Good evening, judges, classmates and debaters:

I am a bear, and I am a debater in journalism. Today, our view is that "top students come from famous teachers". Let me elaborate on our point of view:

Sit down and argue and define the present. First of all, by consulting dictionaries, dictionaries and other related materials, we come to the conclusion that a "famous teacher" is defined as a person with profound knowledge, noble morality or charming personality. He may not be a generalist, but he must have made great achievements in some aspects and passed on what he has to people. At the same time, a "famous teacher" may be a good book, a famous saying and an inspirational video, which is beneficial to a person's development, so he is a "famous teacher". The definition of "high apprentice" refers to the talents who have made achievements in their own industry in a certain respect.

Specifically, our debate has the following arguments:

first

Compared with ordinary teachers, famous teachers can provide their disciples with more professional knowledge, give them better training, teach them the latest knowledge in their own research fields, be good at tapping students' potential and provide them with contacts and more social resources; A "famous teacher" like a good book, a famous saying and an inspirational video provides more opportunities for people who see him to set goals, establish ideals and beliefs and strive to become better people. Isn't this a noble apprentice?

Second point

Confucius had seventy-two disciples in ancient times, such as Yan Hui, Zhong You and Zi Gong. Sun Bin and Pang Juan have studied the name of Guiguzi, Wang Xianzhi has studied Wang Xizhi, Aristotle has studied Plato, and

Plato learned Socrates again. Confucius, Guiguzi, Wang Xizhi, Socrates and Plato, which one is not a famous teacher? Yan Hui, Zhong You, Zi Gong, Sun Bin, Pang Juan and Aristotle, which one is not an apprentice?

Therefore, we think that "a great apprentice comes from a famous teacher". Thank you.

Distinguished guests and comrades:

On this beautiful night with cool autumn wind and sweet osmanthus fragrance, we witnessed the successful conclusion of Yuyang Rural Commercial Bank's "reactive power is wrong" debate in the wonderful debate between the debaters of both sides. Looking back on every game in the preliminaries, semi-finals and finals, I am very pleased and excited. I applaud the wonderful performance of our young employees and the success of the debate! I am proud that we have many talented and promising young employees! Here, on behalf of the Party Committee of the Bank, I would like to express my warm congratulations to the winners and teams in today's debate, and my heartfelt thanks to all the staff and all the contestants who organized and guided this debate. Here I also talk about my personal feelings and put forward some requirements:

First, the form of the debate can be said to be a precedent for our industry. By watching every debate, I think it is a good corporate culture activity. The process of debate is a speculative process, which can exercise our writing organization ability, logical thinking ability and language expression ability, make employees' knowledge more abundant and extensive, and make their thinking more agile and logical, which is very helpful to improve everyone's comprehensive quality. In my opinion, to build an attractive rural commercial bank, there should be a clear voice of learning and a voice of debate to explore the truth. All our staff should strive to create an atmosphere of speculative learning, so that knowledge can enrich our minds and increase our talents. Let the truth fill the spiritual world, so as to serve customers and society in a true ideological realm. Therefore, in the future, we should organize more activities that employees love, so that young employees can increase their knowledge and talents in practice. At the same time, they can also give full play to their enthusiasm and initiative, and independently carry out some community activities under the guidance of the organization, providing them with a platform to display their talents and further enriching the connotation of corporate culture.

Second, for the debate itself, it does not exist for competition. In a complex society, people's understanding is right and wrong, there is truth and falsehood on the road of scientific research, and there are gains and losses in the fierce commercial competition. At this time, we need to use the power of wisdom and the advantages of language to refute the false, evil and ugly and safeguard the truth, goodness and beauty. This is called debate! Therefore, the essence of debate lies in Tao, not in winning or losing. Therefore, the debate is not only a form, but also should continue to guide each of us to think after the debate. The topic of this debate itself is also closely related to our work and life, which has strong practical significance. The debate that "reactive power is wrong" plays an important role in improving the understanding of the importance of one's work and promoting the motivation of work and study. Obviously, through the debate on this issue, we can make it clear how to start a business better and point out the direction. If a person doesn't want to be an official and muddle along in his post, he is mediocre; If you just shout slogans and don't implement them, you can't do anything. It's futile. Mediocre people, when monks can't hit the sky, have weak organizational discipline and low work efficiency, and are ashamed of their posts and organizational training; People who do nothing delay their career and development. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the education, strict management and assessment of cadres and workers, effectively solve the problem of "not being an official, not wanting to be an official, not being an official", train and motivate those cadres who want to be an official, be able to be an official, and succeed, with clear rewards and punishments, so that those who muddle along have no place to live, and fundamentally ensure a good work style.

Thirdly, through the debate, I think this is an effective way to improve the comprehensive ability of employees and should be adhered to for a long time. This activity has been widely concerned and praised by the staff of the whole bank. It is generally believed that the debating competition plays a very important role in enriching and promoting the corporate culture construction of the bank, and also has a high level. Both sides of the debate can firmly grasp the topic, argue according to reason, be strict in logic and rich in examples, which is very enjoyable and can cheer everyone up. For the debaters who participated in the debate, this activity had a more important impact. From the preparation of defense to presentation to free debate, careful preparation and fierce debate have made them understand a lot and mature a lot. This progress is not only reflected in the fluency and persuasiveness of words, but also in the cultivation of their agility, logic and rigor, and employees have stronger self-confidence in participating in competition. All these have laid a good foundation for them to better face the unit and society. I look forward to making the debate contest a masterpiece of our corporate culture.

Debate is an activity with a long history and enlightening wisdom. Since the history of civilization, human beings have been caught in the "quagmire" of debate because of the impulse to pursue truth and the pleasure of enjoying the agitation of thinking. Therefore, I hope that our debate competition will be better and better, with high quality and high level, and become a beautiful landscape of our corporate culture construction.

Finally, I wish you good health, smooth work and all the best!

Thank you!

Moderator: Good morning, teachers and students! I am xx from Class 3, Grade 2, and now I declare the debate contest of Class 3, Grade 2, Grade 1 officially started. Let's invite pros and cons in. The topic of this debate is "Is it better to be nervous before the exam or less nervous?" . The positive view is that "pre-test stress is good", while the negative view is that "pre-test stress is good".

First of all, please make a positive argument to illustrate our point of view.

Positive statement: the host is good and the other party is friendly. The focus of our debate today is that it is better to be more stressed before the exam. As we all know, pressure is the source of motivation. Without pressure, we have no motivation to learn. At the same time, stress can prevent our minds from being too loose and make us in a tense and more efficient learning state, which is very important for us to prepare for the exam. Finally, while making us ideal, pressure will also stimulate our potential and force us to move towards higher goals, so as to achieve better results in exams.

Moderator: Thank you for your wonderful speech. Let's ask the opposing party to demonstrate and explain our point of view.

The opposing side argued: Hello everyone! Our view is that it is better to have less stress before the exam. I will show our views below. Pressure can motivate us to move forward, which has an encouraging effect, but too much pressure will only make us tired of learning. If the pressure is low, you can create a relaxed study environment, which can not only ease the study fatigue on weekdays, but also reduce the psychological burden during exams. Too much pressure can easily lead to bad emotions such as nervousness, anxiety, irritability, etc., and then affect our poor state, fail to play our due level, and eventually lead to failure in the exam. Secondly, learning lies in the usual accumulation, and knowledge can only be used by us after countless attempts and practices, not by sharpening the gun before the exam. If you listen carefully in class and finish the homework assigned by the teacher after class, you will naturally be less nervous and less stressed during the exam. My speech is over, thank you.

Moderator: Thank you for your wonderful speech. Let's continue the debate. First of all, please make a one-on-one fight against the argument.

Two arguments for it: two arguments against it. Hello. You advocate not reviewing before the exam, so is it better not to review before the exam?

Counterparty argument: the debater's question is really good, but my heart is not fluctuating and I even want to laugh. Obviously, the other debater didn't understand our argument at all, so he made subjective assumptions and distorted our views through one-sided understanding. It can be said that their questions are not only ridiculous, but also untenable. We emphasize the importance of studying in peacetime, but we don't deny reviewing. On the contrary, we are not opposed to reviewing before the exam, nor do we deny the importance of reviewing before the exam. We are opposed to high-pressure review before the exam, because great pressure will not only help us concentrate, but will bring great burden to our body and mind and affect our efficiency. In the study, we should pay attention to "moderate relaxation, combining work and rest", that is, after intense study, we should relax in time and adjust our mood and state when preparing for the exam. This is the best and most effective method. Thank you all.

Moderator: Thank you. Let's ask the opposing side to take on the pros.

Objection to the other side's argument: Objection to the other side's argument: Hello, my question is, some "schoolmasters" can get good grades by their own cleverness even if they don't review, so is useless review effective for them?

Two positive arguments: two negative arguments raise really ridiculous questions. Is this concept a generalization of the whole? There is no absoluteness in the world, there are exceptions to everything, and everything should be treated dialectically. Indeed, there are very smart people in this world, but only a few. We are more ordinary people. We need a planned review before the exam, so as to consolidate and improve ourselves. Besides, even if you are a scholar, can you guarantee that you can get 100 in every exam? Can you guarantee that there are no defects in your study? Can you guarantee that you can get good grades without reviewing? Of course not. Everyone should know an ancient prose called Shang Zhong Yong, in which Fang Zhongyong, the hero, is not as talented as Wang Anshi, but he finally "disappeared from everyone". One reason, isn't it stress? It can be seen that no matter who, there must be pressure before the exam. Only in this way can you get good grades. My speech is over, thank you.

Moderator: Thank you. Let's invite the opposing side to make a concluding statement.

Three arguments are at loggerheads: friends from all sides, to sum up, we believe that a little less pressure before the exam can make us review in a relaxed and happy environment, save energy and get good grades in the exam. Therefore, less stress before the exam is the right choice.

Moderator: Thank you. Now, please make a summary statement on the three arguments.

Three arguments: debaters, to sum up, we think that the great pressure before the exam can stimulate our potential, check and fill gaps, and improve review efficiency. Finally, I sum up our views in one sentence, that is: pressure is motivation, and pressure is efficiency; If you want to do well in the exam, you must have pressure before the exam.

Moderator: Thank you for your wonderful speeches, which gave us a lot of thinking and inspiration.

There are different opinions on whether it is better to be nervous before the exam or less, and there is no unified standard answer. However, what has been formed in this debate is that there should be pressure before the exam.

Examination is a way to test our learning effect at a certain stage. All the students want to get good grades to prove themselves. Then, we should give ourselves a little pressure to become urgent and devote ourselves to review and consolidation.

The stress before the exam often varies from person to person. Some students are so demanding and stressed that they suffer from "pre-exam syndrome" and even affect their diet and sleep; Some students don't have high demands on themselves, and the pressure is too small. They have the idea of "playing quizzes and big exams", which will affect their physical and mental health and academic performance. As the debater said just now, the greater the pressure, the higher the spring will bounce, but when the pressure exceeds the elastic limit, the spring will never bounce again. In fact, the real schoolmaster knows how to control the pressure, so if you want to become a schoolmaster, you might as well start with your own appropriate pressure.

Nearly half of the semester is over. If you haven't smelled the mid-term exam, you should start to put more pressure on yourself. If you feel too stressed, you might as well have a rest. Learning by combining work and rest can get twice the result with half the effort. I hope everyone can control the pressure and welcome the mid-term exam with a positive and healthy attitude.

I wish all students can achieve satisfactory results!

This is the end of the class three debate competition in xx. Thank you!

Debate Speech 5 Dear leaders, teachers, guests and students,

Good afternoon everyone! I am honored to speak here on behalf of Shiyan Vocational and Technical College Student Speech and Eloquence Association.

First of all, I would like to thank the leaders and teachers present for their concern and support for our student club activities in spite of their busy schedules. Let's give them the warmest applause! Thank you!

Secondly, I would like to thank the guests and students inside and outside the school for actively participating in this activity organized by the Students' Speech and Eloquence Association of our college and giving us some support and help. Let's give them the warmest applause! Thank you!

Thanks again to the contestants from nine departments for their wonderful performance. It is your hard work that makes us feel the vitality of young students. Let's give them the warmest applause! Thank you! !

Finally, I would like to thank all the staff comrades who worked hard for this activity in the oral part. They just want to work hard and don't ask about the harvest. Let's give them the warmest applause! You have worked hard!

A word of argument is more important than Jiuding's treasure; A glib tongue is better than a million teachers. As an activity to lead campus culture and spread advanced ideas, the Golden Autumn Debate Competition for College Students has been going on for 14 sessions. The outcome of this debate is the best in history. First of all, the venue has changed from a small classroom that can only accommodate 100 people to a library conference center that can now accommodate 500 people. Secondly, there are as many as nine teams participating in this competition. Moreover, the excitement and intensity of this debate were not achieved in previous years, and the lineup of guest judges was extraordinary. The success of this activity is due to the strong support of the leading teachers of the college and the joint efforts of all staff of Qixin.

Since September of this semester, we have been considering the related matters of this autumn's college students' debate competition; After more than three months of planning, the 14th Jingqiu College Debate Competition was successfully held from the first preliminary contest to today's finals. Behind us, there has always been a group of passionate and hard-working new forces fighting side by side with us, giving up spare time, compressing rest time and even sacrificing dinner time in order to have new breakthroughs, new highlights and new records in this debate. We are strict with ourselves with first-class standards in every debate. In the process of organizing, we are also trying to sum up and constantly correct problems, so every debate we organize has made great progress.

I hope we can hold more extensive inter-school debates and speech contests on the basis of the next session, so as to promote the development of our campus culture, strengthen exchanges and communication between universities, enrich students' after-school life and improve their cultural literacy.

My speech is over, thank you!

Debate Speech 6 Dear Chairman, leaders, teachers, debaters and students,

Hello everyone! It's an honor to comment on the first debate in our school.

Debate is a difficult form of language thinking in language expression. "Debate" and "debate" cannot be separated from "words". I think the deep level and commanding height are cultural heritage and philosophical speculation.

"Discipline promotes personality development" and "Discipline inhibits personality development" seem to be opposite, but don't make them absolute, they are both opposite and unified. You can't look at things with a simple thinking that divides into two, that is, you can't look at things with a thinking that is either good or bad or black or white. Is it the ocean besides mountains? There are hills, plateaus and plains. Is it white except black? There are also red, orange, yellow, green, blue, blue and purple. Are they bad people except good people? There are good people and bad people. Emperor Taizong was a wise monarch and initiated the change of Xuanwu Gate. Emperor Yang Di was a fool, but he built the Grand Canal. Therefore, both sides of our debate should adopt the idea of "one divides into three". There must be a zone between the enemy and ourselves. With this zone, we can advance or retreat, and there will be more room for manoeuvre. Today, the other side has done better in this respect. Both sides of the debate field should not only stick to their own views, but also know how to do dialectical analysis.

The topic of today's debate is "Discipline and Personality Development". I remember the composition topic we used in the new curriculum standard grade examination paper. When we open the clothes of the material, we will see its core and find that the college entrance examination composition wants us to talk about the relationship between "what and what". 20 13 courage and experience, 14 rules and flexibility, 15 family and law. If you can prepare a wonderful debate, writing an argumentative paper is a piece of cake.

The outcome of the debate depends largely on the preparation stage. You have to be prepared to be confident. Before the game, you should not only prepare arguments to prove your point of view, but also refute the other side's argument. We should also have ideas about the methods of argument. We should think well in advance whether our strategy is to fight for every inch of land and keep the enemy out of the country, or to lure the enemy to gather in depth and annihilate them. Sun Tzu's Art of War and Thirty-six Strategies may also come in handy at this time.

The outcome of the debate depends not only on preparation, but also on performance. Only by being flexible can we remain calm and personable at the scene. Also depends on cooperation. Teamwork is very important. Only by uniting and interlocking can the debate have a flowing aesthetic feeling. It depends on passion, justice is in the chest, and truth can be full; Also depends on morale, strong and fierce, in order to defeat the opponent.

As we are all beginners in debate, I would like to say a little about my views on debate.

The judgment of victory or defeat in today's debate stumped our judges because you all performed very well. The debaters quoted the classics and were familiar with history. For example, when they argued against each other, they turned over the history of China and analyzed the repression of discipline on human nature from the perspective of feudal rule. A series of rhetorical questions in the pros and cons are very powerful. The opposing argument uses the school uniform that every student feels to talk about the suppression of discipline on personality, and uses the things around him to talk about his own views and arguments. The argument is well chosen. In the offensive and defensive stage, the opposing four parties used the restatement of the debate to refute each other's questions and attacked the shield with the spear of the child. Metaphorically speaking, the opposing three debates win with rhetorical questions. "In my eyes, you are a naughty monkey", humorous and friendly language makes our debate lively.

There are also shortcomings in everyone's debate. Express your views forcefully in the debate, but don't speak too fast, which will make it difficult for the audience to accept. You are both anxious and not calm enough when you quarrel. Not calm enough, because the debater can't recite the prepared things, but still depends on the information card. When we have answers, how to draw bamboo looks good.

No matter who wins the championship team and the best debater, I hope that the winner will not be arrogant and impetuous, and the loser will not lose his grace. Victory and failure are beautiful flowers on our growth path, and we will learn a lot from today's debate. I also hope that students will have a new understanding of school discipline through today's participation, and I also hope that students will learn how to argue rationally and politely from today's activities.

Thank you!

;