The German youth Lu Anke in the material is obviously a low-key person. He contributed to China's educational research in obscurity, and had a great and little-known influence. If "China Newsweek" and "Face to Face" pay attention to him to thank him for his contribution to China's education, then we can understand. But what kind of mentality did the waves of young people run to Lu Anke's residence? I don't know, maybe Lu Anke doesn't know, so he chose to leave and keep a low profile in an undisturbed place.
Danish Queen Margrethe II also chose to keep a low profile. As a queen deeply loved by the people, she never compares her living standard with other heads of state. Even in the period when the funds of the palace were particularly tight, she had to earn money by translating literary works to subsidize her daily expenses, instead of asking the government to increase the annuity of the palace. Margrethe II has also quietly contributed to the national water and electricity conservation, and the palace where she lives is a Danish "model unit" for water and electricity conservation. She is like Lu Anke, because they both choose to keep a low profile. But they are also different, because her low profile is not disturbed. She has been so calm and steady, keeping a low profile, contributing her strength to Denmark and becoming the spiritual leader of Denmark.
Of course, some people choose high-profile. Chen cursor, the "first good in China", chose to be a high-profile person and do high-profile things. He promised to "donate naked" after his death-donate all his property to charity. This high profile is bound to drive more people to contribute to charity in China and even the world. However, some people question this high profile, and many people think that Chen cursor is putting on a show. Although Chen cursor has not made any response to this negative evaluation, it does not mean that his high profile can be interfered. Whether "charity" is true or show, it has substantial significance-it can help many "big eyes" who are eager to go to school.
We let Luanke, who has contributed to China for more than ten years, run away with his out-of-tune behavior. Should we continue to go out of tune and let "China first" Chen cursor run away? We are young, we are full of energy, we have ideals and ambitions, but we can't "run amok" and let our stupid behavior stop there!
In modern society, China is backward in system, technology and consciousness. Today, we have caught up with the system and technology, but only our consciousness is still stagnant. Should we continue to fall behind?
You can keep a low profile or a high profile, but please don't go out of tune.