In the exam-oriented composition, the biggest factor that determines the score is whether it fits the meaning of the question and whether it is close to the center. Especially in the composition of college entrance examination, the loss of scores caused by lax deduction is far more serious than the loss caused by language expression and structural errors. The composition of the college entrance examination should not be implicit enough to make the examiner confused, but should be as clear as possible so that the examiner can find the close connection between your composition and the meaning of the question. Choosing a topic can make the college entrance examination composition eye-catching, clear, clear-headed and prominent.
No matter what kind of composition topic, there are some keywords. If the key words do not appear repeatedly in writing, but other key words appear, or the key words appear occasionally, there will be suspicion of digression. Therefore, no matter how well your composition is written, you should try to buckle the theme at the title, beginning, middle and end of the article, giving people a feeling of sticking to the theme. I want to deduct a topic for brother Lu all the way.
It can be said that the deduction of the topic is the cornerstone of getting the score, the coup to get the high score of the composition, and the lifeline to save the digression.
Second, deductive method
The key to deduction is to learn the key expressions of sentences. Students should carefully understand how sentences fix the key words discussed and highlight the key meaning they want to express. There are many ways to highlight the key points of a sentence, such as word emphasis (putting the content to be emphasized after yes), subject emphasis, inversion emphasis, rhetorical emphasis, parallelism emphasis, metaphor emphasis, complex sentence emphasis (turning emphasis, causal emphasis, progressive emphasis, etc.). ) and so on. In particular, I learned to use three ways of highlighting semantics: subject highlighting, sentence highlighting and rhetoric highlighting.
For example, it is more appropriate to demonstrate the idea of "repairing a good ear" with the events in Zou Ji's satire on coachable, King of Qi. If the King of Qi is a headstrong and self-righteous guy, Zou Ji's words are casting pearls before swine, no matter how beautiful! To demonstrate that "feelings affect people's cognition of things", you can state the material as follows: If it is not because Zou Ji's wife loves Zou Ji very much, how can she think that Zou Ji, who is "far away from Confucianism (Xu Gong)", will be more beautiful than Xu Gong? If we want to demonstrate the view that "the government should set up a truth prize", we can state the materials as follows: If the King of Qi does not set up a reward system, how can ministers make bold suggestions? Is the King of Qi sincere? Could it be a reputation? Ministers have no reason not to doubt!