Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What are the answers to the characteristics of argumentative writing?
What are the answers to the characteristics of argumentative writing?
The characteristics of argumentative writing are: argumentative writing structure, argumentative writing method, argumentative thinking and argumentative writing technology. The characteristics of argumentative writing refer to the basic structure of argumentative writing, which consists of introduction, theory and conclusion. Generally speaking, the introduction is the beginning, the theory is the theme and the conclusion is the end. In other words, you must put forward a topic or argument at the beginning, and choose materials for the main part to make a separate argument.

Causality is more dialectical and logical. The mutual transformation of things under certain conditions is a very common phenomenon. For example, in the field of liquid balance of ecological flat cover, there is a wide causal relationship between them. To analyze the causal relationship between two things, we should not only indicate the relationship between the two things, but also explain under what conditions cause and effect will be transformed into each other.

Extended data

Generally speaking, the reliability of analogical reasoning depends on the relationship between the attributes owned by * * * and the derived attributes. If the attribute of * * * is closely related to the derived attribute, the reliability of the conclusion will be greater; If the degree of connection is low, the reliability of the conclusion is low; If it's irrelevant, you can't make an analogy.

Use analogy argument need to pay attention to the following points:

(1) Use similar objects for analogy. There are infinitely many things in the world that have some identical or similar properties, and some of them are completely irrelevant. Comparing them is unconvincing.

(2) Avoid using analogy alone to demonstrate a way of argument. It is best to combine it with other argumentation methods to make it play a supplementary and rich role.

(3) Pay attention to the extent to which the conclusion can be reached. Unless there are certain circumstances, the conclusion is generally only a possibility. In terms of expression, we should grasp the discretion and not be absolute.