Generally speaking, there are three ways to start the feeling of reading: (1) The first way is direct description, which directly describes the cause and background of reading.

Example 1: Happy summer vacation is coming, and the teacher recommended us to read the article "Sharks that can't swim", so that we can understand how to face difficulties and adversity in life.

Exodus 2: I have been reading the book Around the World in 80 Days these days, and I was deeply attracted by this book unconsciously. As if I had just returned from an adventure, I felt nervous and strange, but also relaxed and interesting.

(2) The second method is suspense method, which guides readers by asking questions or setting questions.

Exodus 1: each of us has to face all kinds of difficulties, big and small, so what attitude should we take to face them? So the teacher asked us to read Sharks that Don't Swim, from which we can learn how to face difficulties.

(3) The third method, the conclusion preposition method, is to put the conclusion after reading at the beginning and get to the point.

Exodus 1: Both the animal kingdom and human beings have to face all kinds of difficulties and adversities. In the face of these difficulties and adversity, we should not be negative and discouraged, but should actively face and overcome them, which may bring us greater gains. This is my feeling after watching Sharks Without Swimming.

Exodus 2: Among the books I have read, there are not many deep impressions, but Notre Dame de Paris left a deep impression on me, for nothing else, because it showed me not only the history at that time, but also the deepest soul and call in the world.

2. The basic structural framework of post-reading feeling

Correct writing should follow the general framework of argumentative writing, which consists of three parts: argument, argument and conclusion. The beginning is the question, which is the argument part. There should be two meanings. First, make a brief introduction to the object of analysis (that is, this work): what's its name (title), who is the author (filmed by that station), what genre (column) it belongs to, what to say, what theme to express, etc. The second is to make an overall evaluation of this work, that is, to put forward the central argument of the whole paper, such as "this film is very successful". The middle is the subject, which is the part of questioning and argumentation. It is necessary to analyze the success of this film and what creative experience it has. It is suggested to talk about at least three aspects (or characteristics) of posts and telecommunications, write a short paragraph in each aspect and extract a comment (that is, a small argument) in each aspect. Small arguments should be incisive, neat and eye-catching, and inductive sentences should be neat. In order to highlight small points, it should be placed at the beginning of each small paragraph, or changed into a thick inscription layout, or saved as a subtitle. You can also add "first, second, third" or "first, second, again" before it, or use parallelism. After that, I will make an analysis around this little argument, "put facts and be reasonable." It is necessary to combine the content of the film, give specific examples, describe the discussion, and analyze the expression effect while describing the relevant plot or shot to prove the correctness of your point of view. There are two tendencies to be prevented here. First, the simple narrative content has become storytelling. Second, it's just talk, or empty lyricism, without combining specific content, completely out of touch with the work, air to air, that won't do either. Please note that this part is the main body of the article and determines the level of the article. The length should represent most of the full text, and it will not work if it is short. Finally, the conclusion is the method to solve the problem, which is the conclusion part. This part is very short, mainly to summarize the full text, or point out its shortcomings, or raise hopes, or supplement explanations, or take care of the beginning. With this part, the article has a beginning and an end, which is intact and forms a plot, leaving a deep impression on people.

This is the conventional writing method of the paper, and you can certainly master it flexibly. Don't take the "frame" as a "frame" and limit your thinking. But as far as middle school students are concerned, this format is generally more suitable. It is suggested to write a paragraph outline first, at least think about which layers of meaning to say, and then write paragraph by paragraph according to the outline. In this way, the framework of the paper is very stable, and you can make large paragraphs clear, with clear levels and prominent small arguments.

After solving the theme and structure problems, the next difficulty is, from which aspects to analyze? How to extract small arguments? This problem is generally a headache, so we might as well learn to refine it step by step from shallow to deep, from perceptual to rational.

We can get inspiration from the post-review films. What are the reading tips and thinking questions that can be smelled out? What does the teacher think of your composition? If you think deeply from here, you can learn to grasp the theme (central idea), structure (paragraph) and technique (writing characteristics). I suggest you learn some common sense of literary theory. Only in this way can we find theoretical weapons and improve our appreciation ability. Such as: literature and life, literature and politics, literary typicality, literary criticism, creative methods, genres, genres, styles, etc. In particular, the concept of "typical" is widely used.

Television common sense. Television has its own characteristics, such as: sound and shape, audio-visual integration, not limited by time and space, speaking in camera language, montage and so on. If we can understand some techniques of TV creation and be familiar with its working procedures, we can analyze it from the perspective of TV.

1. theme. Theme is the theme and central idea of the work. Can be compared with similar works to see which is more profound; We can also analyze its realistic pertinence in combination with the background of the times; You can also analyze whether the topic is wonderful.

2. people What kind of person is the protagonist of the work, whether the image is distinctive and outstanding, what are the personality characteristics, what practical things are used in the work to describe, what are the characteristics of the minor characters and what is the relationship with the main characters.

3. Material selection. What materials are used to express the theme, whether these materials are true, specific, concentrated and detailed, which materials are particularly typical and the details are particularly wonderful.

4. Structural aspects. The work is divided into several parts, such as what is the clue, how to start, how to end, how to transition, how to take care of it, and whether the structure is rigorous.

5. In terms of skills. What creative techniques are used in the works (such as: comparison, expressing ambition, borrowing scenery to express emotion, symbol, seeing the big from the small, etc.). ). Are these successful, novel and distinctive?

6. news If it is a news work, it also involves many news issues. Such as: authenticity and timeliness, whether the news adheres to the principles of party spirit, mass and militancy, whether Cai Fang is in-depth and whether the support is successful.

7. This side of the camera. Television speaks with a lens, and how to use its lens language (composition, color, light, speed, subtitles, special effects, sound, etc. ), what montage techniques were used in those shots, and so on.

8. Other aspects. In addition, all aspects of creation, as long as you feel very distinctive, you can also choose. Such as: music, art, performance, broadcasting, hosting and so on.

3. The basic structural framework of post-reading feeling

Don't write a good-looking film analysis article, the key is whether you can accurately grasp the genre of the article. The most common mistake made by candidates is improper examination of questions, which does not meet the requirements of the examination at all and the genre is inappropriate. Write it down as a feeling of experience and review. In this way, even if the article is very literary, even if you "feel good about yourself", the score will not be very high. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the difference between the feelings after watching the movie and the film analysis.

First, the genre of the article is different. A kind of articles, such as feedback and experience, basically belong to the category of lyric articles, with lyrical color; Secondly, film analysis is a kind of literary criticism, which belongs to the category of argumentative essays and has a strong theoretical color. The former is heavier.

Feeling, the latter focuses on discussion. The former often contains emotional sentences, such as "I am very moved after reading this work", "I am very angry" and "I am full of feelings". The latter, on the other hand, is indifferent, and generally adopts various discussion means to discuss and analyze, without pursuing emotion and "literary talent".

Secondly, the identity of the author is different. When writing a review, the author is an ordinary audience; When writing the movie viewing analysis, the author's identity has become a "commentator" and an "insider", at least a "quasi-TV person" who may enter the TV industry in the near future. Since you come to apply for the exam, you should be prepared and have potential qualities, so you should cultivate your professional quality and professional awareness. When watching TV, they can't confuse themselves with an ordinary audience, but must be more careful and think more: if I am an expert and a judge, how should I evaluate it? If I am a colleague, what should I learn from him? What should I do if I am allowed to shoot? In a word, you must look for the feelings of people in TV, gradually cultivate professional vision and gradually complete the evolution of roles: audience-quasi-TV people-TV people-experts.

Again, different goals. The post-review is aimed at "this matter", that is, the content of the work; Second, the viewing analysis is aimed at "this movie", that is, the work itself. The question answered by the former is: How do you feel after knowing this? What does this give you? The latter answered this question, how to understand this work? What are the more successful places? For example, The Hard Green Dream tells the story of a afforestation model. He worked hard to plant trees for decades, but the number was cut down. If you write a review, you should aim at this matter and of course express your sadness and condemnation. When writing a film analysis, we should analyze the reasons for its award-winning and express admiration and appreciation for its successful experience. The tone of the two is obviously different.

Finally, the emphasis of the article is different. The feeling of review focuses on the ideological and educational significance of the work; Viewing analysis focuses on the creative experience of works, including artistic forms. The former requires sticking to the theme and expressing feelings in connection with reality; The latter requires closely tracking the creative characteristics, analyzing its expression effect and how its form serves the content.

4. The basic structural framework of post-reading feeling

After reading this story, we want to write a post-reading feeling, the topic is the post-reading feeling of saving lives, or the post-reading feeling of saving lives. How to write a review? In fact, I mainly write two parts, 1 part is called reading, and the second part is called feeling. These two parts are interrelated and there is a bridge between them. This bridge is called views, thoughts and feelings. This is a reading point of view and a feeling of summing up. We read the content of the article, not the content of the book. We read a sentence in the article and found it very reasonable, similar to what we have experienced, empathetic and inspired. It is equivalent to reading a point in the article, for example, we should get along well with people around us and should not look down on those people, because you may also get their help.

Just like a tiger saved a mouse. The mouse said, I will repay you later. The tiger laughed at him. What can a mouse like you do for me? But then, by chance, the mouse really helped the tiger. Don't underestimate that at the right time and place, each of us is very useful.

Because we read an idea, we follow this feeling and relate it to our own life. After reading this book and this article, we can contact our own life, because there is a point in the middle that we agree with. Connecting these parts is a review.

What did you read in the 1 section? What makes you think?

The second part puts forward a point of view from what you have read with great emotion.

The third part, find a concrete example in your own life to prove your point.

At the end of the fourth, the point of view is highlighted again. You can also recommend this article and this book to your friends.

5. Basic structural framework of post-reading feeling

First of all, we should read the original text intensively and master the main contents comprehensively. The main content of this article should be clear. Knowing this, we can quietly think about what we want to say, what impressed us the most, that is, which factors in the text can arouse your emotions the most, thus establishing the central point of our writing. For example, when we read The Little Match Girl, some readers may compare the fate of the little girl with their own, sympathize with the tragic experience of the little girl and lament the happiness of their life, so the center is set to "cherish the happiness around them and be grateful for the gift of life". Some readers may focus on their parents' love and lament that the little girl has no love from relatives in her life, hoping to share her parents' love with the poor little girl.

In short, your feelings are different, and the central point of the article will be different. The following composition should focus on your central topic.

Second, with the center, it is necessary to establish a suitable topic around this center.

There are several ways to start a topic: for example, how you feel after watching The Little Match Girl, or how you feel after watching The Little Match Girl. This is the simplest topic, and you can also add a subtitle to the above topic, for example, reading "The Feeling of the Little Match Girl"-the life of a loved one is really happy. You can also use only topics similar to subtitles. I think using double titles can let readers know your topic center and topic source.

How do primary school students write their feelings after reading? How to write a review? . Joint image expert group

Third, the text generally has several major sections like this.

1. Explain the basic information about the original text at the beginning.

The basic information of the original text includes the name of the work, the author, the main content of the work, your overall feelings and so on. You don't have to explain all this information at the beginning, but you can arrange it according to your writing style. Take tom sawyer's Reading Experience as an example. The opening begins like this: Speaking of reading, it's my hobby. The books read are not counted, among which The Adventures of Tom Sawyer is the most childlike. The author of this book is Mark Twain, a master of American literature. After reading this book, I deeply felt the courage and justice of the protagonist Tom.

At the beginning of this paper, only the name of the work, the overall feelings of the author and readers are written, and the second part arranges the main stories. With the introduction of key content, the reader's inner feelings are written without trace.

2. The second part focuses on readers' feelings.

There are many ways to write about feelings.

The first way: when writing feelings, you can combine the natural narration of the original text, and remember to use this sentence: "My feelings are …" This expression is blunt and tasteless, and the plot of the original text is isolated from the feelings, which cannot arouse the readers' emotions. We can apply a touching plot in the original text to find the starting point of the topic and let our emotions flow naturally.

Second, you can also quote sentences from the original text to talk about your feelings. For example, after reading The Old Man and the Sea, we can introduce the sentence "Man is not born to be defeated, you can try your best to destroy him, but you can't beat him" into the post-reading feeling, and then write your feelings after reading this sentence, which can evaluate the indomitable spirit of the old man, and also write related stories about persistence and strength that you associate with reading this sentence.

The third type: it is related association caused by original content. These related contents may be similar to the original text, thus causing readers to want to compare and comment, or they may be triggered by the original content, thus stimulating their passion for setting goals and expressing their determination. Writing these out is also the feeling content of reading.

No matter what form it is, we should focus on feelings and write them concretely and profoundly. The original text is only the starting point of feelings, it is the starting point. It is forbidden to describe the original content too much, which is a distraction and does not meet the stylistic requirements of reading.

3. The third part should review and summarize the full text. Write down your feelings, understanding and evaluation of the whole book, or emphasize what you have gained and what you will practice. In this way, the structure of the full text is complete, the focus is prominent, and an excellent post-reading feeling is completed.

As long as we study hard, are good at thinking, and often read and practice writing, it is quite easy to write a good review.