First, face it calmly and maintain a good mental state.
Strong psychology comes from a correct understanding and a solid foundation. This kind of examination questions is the highest level of the objectives and requirements of the college entrance examination outline, that is, to demonstrate and discuss problems. This includes three levels of requirements: using the methods of judgment, comparison and induction to demonstrate historical issues; Comment on the view of history by criticizing, drawing lessons from and quoting; Put forward different views on historical issues and historical viewpoints independently. Therefore, it is difficult to write a small composition. Only when students actively deal with this kind of questions, practice more and summarize more, and form good problem-solving habits and skilled problem-solving skills can they cope calmly in the exam. Otherwise, my heart is already scared, and it is inevitable that I will not panic when writing; The confusion of "writing" will inevitably lead to the defects of incomplete extraction of historical information, unclear argumentation ideas and concise language. Failure in the exam is actually a reflection of your poor state when you answer the questions.
Second, carefully examine the questions and grasp the overall direction of the answers.
The examination angle of historical composition is closely related to the three levels of assessment objectives and requirements of "argumentation and discussion". The main types of questions are: argumentation, comment and suggestion.
1 argument (using judgment, comparison, induction and other methods to demonstrate historical issues).
For example, in the design of the 20 14 college entrance examination question 22 in Jiangsu history volume, in order to facilitate students to understand the meaning of the question, many tips were made on the topic citation and question setting. First, prompt the idea; Secondly, the direction of the answer is suggested, such as "Where is the tradition of expressing content" in the question (1) and "Modernity corresponding to tradition" in the question (2), with clear direction; Finally, it suggests the argumentation ideas that candidates should follow.
② Comment on viewpoints (comment on historical viewpoints by means of criticism, quotation and citation).
For example, 20 12, the new national college entrance examination standard, the fourth1question of the national literature comprehensive volume is open-ended, and students should first explain their agreed views and make a brief demonstration when solving problems. If we choose the view in favor, we can point out the dominant position of modern western countries and the great inertia of China's traditional culture with the view of global history. If you hold an opposing view, you can start from the perspective of China's initiative to change.
Secondly, it is necessary to evaluate the viewpoints in the materials and point out the specific viewpoints or positions behind them, so as to affirm their rationality and criticize their shortcomings. The viewpoint in the material is typical of western centralism, which exaggerates the deterrent effect of the west. Therefore, we should not only attach importance to the external factors of historical development, but also ignore the internal subjective initiative.
(3) put forward opinions (independently put forward different views on historical issues and historical views).
For example, the 20 16 new college entrance examination standard, question 4 1 in the second volume of national synthesis, includes the schematic diagram of Xuanzang's westbound route and Jian Zhen's eastbound route, as well as written materials about their deeds and contributions. According to the requirements, the refined ideas must come from materials, clear and reasonable.
In short, these three types of questions, whether it is the scope of thinking or the writing requirements, have clear hints, so we must be careful when reviewing the questions, find and make good use of the hints given. In this way, when writing, there will be direction, content and scoring points.
Thirdly, organize reasonably and construct the basic framework of writing.
After reviewing the questions, we will begin to write the framework for building a small paper. This link is definitely indispensable. Only by establishing the correct framework can we realize this. Some students can write wherever they want, and the answers are often messy and unclear.
When you answer the debate question, you should first put out your own views, then demonstrate them from as many angles as possible, and finally summarize your own views.
The questions for comments are generally open-ended. When answering this kind of questions, we should first explain our own views and make a brief demonstration, then evaluate the views in the materials and point out their rationality and shortcomings.
When answering the questions that put forward opinions, you must put forward clear opinions in combination with the materials provided, and then comprehensively expound or demonstrate opinions as required.
Fourth, get into the habit and pay attention to the main points.
1 Break through the pattern of inertia thinking.
Although writing a composition is regular, there is no definite rule. Because the examination questions are different year after year, the examination papers are innovative year after year. Therefore, there is generally no fixed routine for solving problems, so we must respond flexibly to different problems. Those who think that mastering several problem-solving methods and forming a set of mature writing routines can change constantly are not desirable. When answering small questions in college entrance examination composition, it is necessary to analyze objectively, not only to find the breakthrough point in solving problems or writing, but also to mechanically copy and apply the previous model within the original thinking framework. Otherwise, in the face of new problems, it is very likely that you will be complacent and self-defeating. Our usual efforts can only be the ladder for us to climb the peak.
2. Make full use of the information in the materials.
The topic of composition is not castles in the air, but the information and knowledge contained in the examination materials. A successful test question has a gradient in design. As an open subjective question, the small paper is generally set at the end, and candidates must read the above materials fully before answering. In order to reduce the difficulty, many test questions have direct or indirect hints in the introduction or setting questions. Therefore, when summing up opinions and arguments, we should make full use of historical data.
3. Straighten out ideas and logic.
Clear viewpoints, diverse perspectives, full historical facts and reasonable argumentation are the basic requirements for judging the good writing of this kind of questions. After reviewing the questions, you must give yourself some time to think carefully, so that you can "build a framework and build a text" more smoothly. The specific steps are as follows: recognize the topic type-put forward your own point of view-find the angle of argument (discussion)-refine the historical facts of materials-list the outline of the paper-organize the language. To meet these basic requirements, we must think clearly and operate step by step. After all, the score of this small question is not low, and it is worth spending more time in the examination room to do every step well. If you get started in a hurry, you can write wherever you want, and it is easy to lose things in a tense environment in the examination room, which is not worth the candle.
4. Combining history with theory, the language is concise.
The essay requires words, but you can't pile up words. Their wording requirements are realized through multiple argumentation angles and through the disciplinary requirements of combining history with theory. So when writing, try to be concise, but pay attention to two aspects. First, the whole article can't have only one paragraph, so let the marking teacher help you find opinions and arguments. This is a headache. Second, we should "combine history with theory, and theory should be based on history", and historical facts should be convincing and reasonable. We should focus on historical facts, supplemented by discussion, and we should not put the cart before the horse, otherwise we will not get high marks without historical facts.
In short, looking at the college entrance examination questions, there are many flowers that disturb people's eyes, and the small composition topic is just one of them. With a little attention, you can see the flowers bloom. So, with optimistic psychology, solid knowledge and skilled problem-solving skills, why not relax and get high marks?
Related articles on problem-solving methods of historical short essays;
1. How to improve the score and answer template of big history questions?
2. Guidance on solving ten types of questions in the history of college entrance examination.
3. The method of analyzing history and the way to solve the problem of material analysis.
4. Steps to solve major historical problems.
5. Short essay on the history of college entrance examination: It is most important to lay a solid foundation at this stage, with strict logic and fluent sentences.
6. Six common comprehensive problems and problem-solving skills in the history of college entrance examination
7. Coping strategies of the college entrance examination history composition.
8. Three steps to do the comprehensive history of literature.
9.2020 History of College Entrance Examination 12 Solution
10. How to do big questions in history