After doing the same experiment and the same result, people can send articles and pass graduation defense, but you can't. That's because you didn't choose the right perspective. The most common thing is what experiments we have done, what results we have obtained and what laws we have found. That's all, the information provided is that you did this experiment and got a little regularity. Others write from another angle, for example, I have developed such a new method, where this new method can be transplanted, and what is its great significance. Then, for example, we did some experiments and got some rules. What are the advantages compared with other people's methods, the data obtained are more reliable and accurate ... and so on. Which do you think is better?