1. Praise the tutor and the author of the teacher's paper for contaminating the paper. We know that the final results of many scientific research will be reflected in the paper. Therefore, writing a thesis is a sacred and rigorous thing in science. However, the author of this paper praised his tutor and teacher's mother in the paper, which is not the function of the paper, and is equivalent to disrespecting the platform of the paper.
Secondly, the author praises the mother of the tutor and the teacher for pushing her tutor and the teacher's mother to the forefront. Although his thesis was successful before being punished, it was also because of his two papers that his tutor and teacher's mother were pushed to the forefront of discussion among netizens. I believe that neither his tutor nor the teacher's mother wants to be a topic of discussion in people's mouths, and I also hope that his students can be praised for their true talents and practical learning.
Third, praise the tutor and the teacher's mother. The author of the paper harmed the editor. These two papers were published in the authoritative monthly. The editor-in-chief of this monthly magazine finally resigned because of his two fake papers. Although the editor-in-chief is indeed partly responsible, the resignation of the editor-in-chief is still attributed to the authors of these two papers.