Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What do you think of the fact that the author of "Zan Mentor and Teacher Niang Paper" was dealt with?
What do you think of the fact that the author of "Zan Mentor and Teacher Niang Paper" was dealt with?
Thesis is a very important thing in academic circles. Publishing a paper is a serious job for every author, and some people play a narrow-minded role in this serious job. It is incredible to praise your tutor and teacher's mother in the paper. Thesis is used to study academic problems, not to flatter. The author of this paper is also a rare flower in the Millennium. I am very much in favor of dealing with the author who praised the tutor and the teacher's mother in his paper, because he did a serious thing in such a disgraceful way, which not only ruined his reputation, but also tarnished the role of the paper and pushed the tutor and the teacher's mother to the forefront. Next, let's talk together. I agree with three reasons for dealing with the author of this paper.

1. Praise the tutor and the author of the teacher's paper for contaminating the paper. We know that the final results of many scientific research will be reflected in the paper. Therefore, writing a thesis is a sacred and rigorous thing in science. However, the author of this paper praised his tutor and teacher's mother in the paper, which is not the function of the paper, and is equivalent to disrespecting the platform of the paper.

Secondly, the author praises the mother of the tutor and the teacher for pushing her tutor and the teacher's mother to the forefront. Although his thesis was successful before being punished, it was also because of his two papers that his tutor and teacher's mother were pushed to the forefront of discussion among netizens. I believe that neither his tutor nor the teacher's mother wants to be a topic of discussion in people's mouths, and I also hope that his students can be praised for their true talents and practical learning.

Third, praise the tutor and the teacher's mother. The author of the paper harmed the editor. These two papers were published in the authoritative monthly. The editor-in-chief of this monthly magazine finally resigned because of his two fake papers. Although the editor-in-chief is indeed partly responsible, the resignation of the editor-in-chief is still attributed to the authors of these two papers.