2. The title of this article does not meet the requirements of financial management; Students are not serious in the process of writing and can't complete the writing task; The paper is not comprehensive, the research content is too shallow, the structure of the paper is unreasonable, and the logic is not rigorous. The conclusion of the paper is wrong, and the format basically does not meet the requirements of paper writing; There is no innovation at work.
3. The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the knowledge learned is used comprehensively to solve the problem. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent.
4. Comments: The title of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language. Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes. The author tried to learn from Lev? Looking for the connection between Tolstoy and a character in Cao Yu's novels. From the content, the author has a further understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials. How to draw my own conclusion through the analysis of the data is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author has made great efforts.
5. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the specification requirements; Rich references and strong timeliness; No plagiarism was found.
6. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the specification requirements; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.
7. The topic is consistent, the argument is prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. ( m.taiks.com )
8. The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to XXXXX's writing standard. The title of the paper is very good and creative. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work. It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The language is also very sharp, and the paper is clear-headed, well-founded, with unique views, which has certain reference value and can be regarded as a good article.
9. The length of the article fully conforms to the regulations of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions.
10, the topic of the paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance).
1 1. This document adopts. } work hard and basically finish the writing task on time; The paper is comprehensive, but the content needs to be deepened. The logic is rigorous, the structure is reasonable, the conclusion is correct, and the format basically meets the requirements of paper writing. There is some innovation in the work, but there is little breakthrough in the previous work.
12, the paper format is correct, the writing is standardized, the organization is clear, and the language is fluent.
13. The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has academic research (reference) value (practical guiding significance).
14. this paper studies XXXX, which has strong practical value and provides a new basis for controlling accounting information distortion. The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results. The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.
15, the topic is completely consistent, the argument is outstanding, and the discussion is closely related to the theme.
16, the student has a strong ability to consult documents, can comprehensively collect information about the examination system, can comprehensively use the knowledge of the examination system in the writing process, comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge.
17. During the three-month graduation project, students can successfully complete the whole graduation project and thesis writing under the strict requirements of teachers. The program can run correctly, the interface is arranged reasonably and the paper meets the requirements. In the whole process of graduation design, I have a correct attitude, study hard and arrange my time reasonably. I can get to the lab on time, and there is no reason to leave early or be late. Can basically complete the corresponding tasks at each stage, but also take the initiative to work overtime, so that time is tight before it is loose. Of course, there are also some shortcomings and areas that need improvement. For example, the knowledge is not wide enough, the ability to deal with problems and apply knowledge needs to be improved, and it is impossible to actively communicate with teachers about the work process. I hope this student will pay attention to these problems in his future work or study and strive for greater improvement and progress.
18, the topic of this paper has strong application value, the literature is collected in detail, and the learned knowledge is comprehensively used to solve the problem. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions.
19. This document adopts. } Work hard, observe discipline, and finish the writing task on time; The paper is comprehensive and thorough, with rigorous logic, reasonable structure and close connection between paragraphs. The conclusion of the paper is correct and the format meets the requirements of paper writing; Have a sense of innovation at work and have their own unique opinions.
20. The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points and clear logical relationship, but it lacks personal opinions.
2 1. This document adopts. The paper is comprehensive, but the research content is not deep enough. The structure of the paper is reasonable and the logic is rigorous, but the cohesion between paragraphs is not close enough. The conclusion of the paper is basically correct, and the format basically meets the requirements of paper writing; The creative significance of the works is weak, and there is no obvious breakthrough in previous studies.
22. The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, can comprehensively collect information about the examination system, can comprehensively use the knowledge of the examination system in the writing process, can comprehensively analyze the graduation thesis of the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge.