Comparative argument is the abbreviation of positive and negative comparative argument, also known as comparative method. It is an argument method that compares and contrasts two things, deduces the difference between them, and sets off the conclusion. Everything in the world often exists in comparison. "Only contrast can distinguish". Once two things are compared, we can tell the difference between them. Therefore, in argumentative writing, the method of comparative argument is often used to compare two contradictory or opposing things and reasons from both positive and negative aspects, so as to reveal the essence of things and make the things expounded more profound and convincing. Contrast between true and false, you can go from false to true; The contrast between good and evil can suppress evil and promote good; Contrast between right and wrong can set things right. Therefore, the use of positive and negative contrast argument is more powerful and clearer than just reasoning from the front. In particular, topics that contain comparative factors, such as thrift and luxury, taking and giving, being content with happiness and not knowing happiness, are all suitable for writing in this way.

Second, the role of argument:

Prove the argument with the incisive opinions in classic works, famous sayings and aphorisms of famous people at home and abroad, and recognized theorem formulas. Reasoning makes the argument authoritative and persuasive. If you quote famous sayings, aphorisms and authoritative data, you can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read.

Third, the role of metaphor argument:

Metaphor argument refers to the method of using analogy to demonstrate analogy. As long as there are similarities between two things, one thing can be compared with another, thus demonstrating a more abstract thing. This is a special method of argument. Metaphor is different from analogy, but the truth is the same. Only when the class is different can we make an analogy; Only when the principles are consistent can reasoning be carried out. It has both similarities and differences with figures of speech of metaphor and analogy. Different classes are the same as metaphors; In the same way, it is different from the metaphor that does not have the function of argument. The reason is the same, and the analogy is the same; But it only requires truth, but not necessarily the truth of the event, which is different from analogy.

Fourth, the role of role models:

Illustrative argument refers to the method of proving the argument with typical examples. By enumerating typical examples, the central argument is proved concretely and forcefully, and the persuasiveness is enhanced. Illustrative argument refers to the method of proving the argument with typical examples. For example, the article "Whistle" lists six whistle phenomena observed by the author from social life, such as "hunting for Rong Lu's favor", "indulging in fame", "accumulating wealth", "enjoying pleasure", "vanity" and "greedy for money", which proves that the human suffering suffered by many people is largely caused by their wrong evaluation of the value of things. Enumerating conclusive, sufficient and representative facts can enhance the power and persuasiveness of discussion.

References:

Baidu encyclopedia entries, with examples.

Baidu encyclopedia entry, metaphorical argument

Baidu encyclopedia entries, comparative demonstration

Baidu encyclopedia entries, arguments