Question 1: People can't become talents without self-improvement. )

Question 2: Contrast and demonstrate with examples. Function of 2 points (if you only give an example, you won't get a point): Through the examples of Edison and Pele, we made a comparison from the positive and negative aspects, which strongly proved the view that people can't become talents without self-reliance.

Question 3: First of all, it is proposed that people can only succeed if they seek self-reliance. Then cite the examples of Edison and Pele, the king of the ball, and compare the advantages and disadvantages. Finally, encourage young friends to get rid of the shelter of others and stand on their own feet.

Question 4: Omission.

Question 1: test analysis: the last sentence of the first paragraph of the article: "In the same way, people are the same, and they will not become talents without self-improvement." This sentence points out the central point of the article.

Comments: Arguments in argumentative papers are the author's views and opinions on the issues discussed, which can generally be found directly from the text and often appear in the following positions of the article: title, beginning, middle part and end.

Question 2:

Analysis of test questions: In paragraph ② ③, Edison and Pele, the king of the ball, are cited as two examples. It can be seen from the word "opposite" that these two paragraphs are in contrast. The author's idea is to say positive examples first, then negative examples, and prove from both positive and negative aspects that "self-reliance is very important to everyone, and only by self-reliance can a person have a bright future." This view.

Comments: The common argumentation methods in junior high school mainly include: example argumentation, reason argumentation, metaphor argumentation, metaphor argumentation and so on. Example: true, concrete and convincing; Reasoning: powerful authority; Metaphorical argument: vivid and easy to understand; Comparative argument: distinguish right from wrong, distinguish right from wrong. No matter which argument method is used, it is to prove the central argument or sub-argument.

Question 3:

Analysis of test questions: The first paragraph of this paper puts forward the central argument, the second paragraph gives two examples of Edison and Bailey, respectively demonstrating the view that "self-reliance is very important for everyone, and only by self-reliance can a person have a bright future", the fourth paragraph gives some examples of teenagers who can't stand on their own feet in real life, calling on parents to let their children learn to stand on their own feet, and the fifth paragraph is the author's summary of the above, making an appeal and reiterating it again.

Comments: To analyze the argumentation ideas of argumentative essays, we must first understand the structure of general argumentative essays: asking questions (introduction)-analyzing questions (papers)-solving problems (conclusions). In fact, analyzing the argumentation idea of argumentative essays is to add some words such as "first", "then", "then" and "last" on the basis of paragraph level.

Question 4:

Test analysis: to do this problem, we should pay attention to our own cases. We can talk about how to get rid of the shelter of our parents and stand on our own feet. How can we learn if we don't let our parents answer?

Comments: To do this kind of topic, we should pay attention to the content of the article and our own life, and pay attention to language expression.