Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - The canonical format of the reference file
The canonical format of the reference file
Standard format of reference file:

[serial number] periodical author. Title [J] Title. Publication year, volume (issue): starting and ending page numbers.

[serial number] monograph author. Title [m]. Edition (the first edition can be omitted). Place of publication: publishing house, year of publication: page numbers.

The author of the [serial number] collection. Title [c]. Edit. The name of the collection. Place of publication: publishing house, year of publication: starting and ending pages.

[serial number] author of dissertation. Title [D] Storage location: storage unit, year.

[serial number] patent owner. Title of the patent document [P]. Country: patent number. Release date.

[serial number] standard number, standard name. Place of publication: publisher, year of publication.

[serial number] newspaper author. Title. Name and publication date (edition) of the newspaper.

[serial number] Report author. Title [R]. Report location: report organizer, year.

[serial number] The author of the electronic document. Title [Identification of electronic documents and carrier types]. The source and date of the document.

Problems needing attention in quoting literature

First, pay attention to the number of citations. If there are too many citations, you can reduce the number of references by citing review papers or papers containing literature reviews.

Second, distinguish between old and new documents. There should not be too many invalid files, unless the invalid files are groundbreaking files, important node files or files whose results you have used.

Third, weigh self-citation and other citation. Don't quote too much from your own literature. Generally speaking, don't just quote the literature of a group of scholars.

Fourth, cite original documents as much as possible. When you quote someone's work, you quote their literature, that is, you quote the original literature. If the second-hand literature improves or writes more clearly the content related to you in the original literature, you can quote the second-hand literature.

In addition, if you can't get the original literature, you can also quote the second-hand literature you have read, but when quoting, you need to quote it in the way of "seeing so-and-so literature", indicating that you have read the second-hand literature.

Fifth, quote the literature you have read. Cite the literature you have read. The most inappropriate way is to copy some documents cited by others directly and quote them equally without reading the cited documents.

Others cite some documents for their own purposes, while we cite them for different purposes. If the purpose is different, the way of selecting materials should be different from the focus, so you must read it yourself before you can quote it.