First of all, false paper duplicate checking reports do exist. Some unscrupulous institutions or individuals mislead others by forging duplicate papers and gain illegitimate interests. The duplicate checking reports of these fake papers may pretend to be issued by authoritative organizations, but in fact, the contents are forged and cannot truly reflect the originality and academic level of the papers. So, how should we distinguish between true and false papers and duplicate reports? Generally speaking, it can be judged from the following aspects:

First, check the source and organization of the report. Real paper duplicate checking reports are usually provided by authoritative organizations or academic journals. We can judge the authenticity of the report by checking the qualification and reputation of the organization. Papers provided by some universities or impartial institutions are usually more credible.

Second, check the contents of the report. The real paper duplicate checking report should include detailed comparison results and paper similarity analysis. We can carefully check the data and analysis process in the report to see if it is reasonable and accurate. False duplicate inspection reports usually lack detailed comparative data, and the analysis results are vague or inaccurate.

In addition, we can also judge by the layout and format of the report. Real paper duplicate checking reports usually have standardized layout and format, including title, header and footer. However, the false paper duplicate checking report may have format confusion and errors.

Finally, we can personally use the regular duplicate checking system to verify. The real paper duplicate checking report usually provides the link or report number of the corresponding duplicate checking system, which we can verify in the official duplicate checking system. If the official duplicate checking system cannot verify the authenticity of the report, it may be a fake paper duplicate checking report.