1. Academic: The first thing a reviewer should consider is the academic nature of the paper, that is, whether the paper has novel ideas, in-depth research and rigorous analysis. This requires reviewers to have certain professional knowledge and research experience.

2. Innovation: Whether the paper puts forward new ideas, new theories or new research methods is an important criterion for evaluating a paper.

3. Logic: Whether the structure of the paper is clear, whether the discussion is organized, whether the arguments are sufficient and whether the reasoning is rigorous are all issues that reviewers need to consider.

4. Regularity: Whether the paper meets the format requirements of the journal, whether the cited documents are accurate, and whether the data and charts are clear are all details that reviewers need to pay attention to.

5. Readability: Whether the language of the paper is fluent and the expression is clear is very important for readers to understand and accept the content of the paper.

6. Importance: Whether the research content of the paper has certain influence and value on academia or society is also a factor that reviewers need to consider.

7. Feasibility: Whether the research method of the paper is feasible and whether the research results are reliable are all issues that reviewers need to consider.

8. Originality: Whether the content of the paper is original or not, and whether there is plagiarism or plagiarism, this is something that reviewers must strictly check.

Generally speaking, the basic standard of peer review of periodicals is to evaluate the academic value and quality of papers comprehensively, fairly and objectively, and to ensure that the published papers have a certain academic level and influence.