1. In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main content and structure of the paper, as well as the research conducted for this purpose, which showed that he had a certain understanding of the research issues. The video design is beautiful, but it doesn't meet the professional requirements. It will be better to design the implementation process from the perspective of computer science.
The student fluently stated the purpose, theory and practical significance of writing this paper. The design process of antique websites is standardized, but there is little contact between entities and general orders. The whole design should meet the requirements of the computer as much as possible.
The student speaks clearly and answers questions fluently. Although the paper has a good idea and certain research value, the framework and content are huge, which requires strong independent research ability, and the title of the paper and the client login server module need to be slightly modified. The students are well prepared, the link sentences are complete, the thesis is clearly conceived, which embodies a good professional foundation and a good grasp of time. That is, there is a demand in the paper but there is a lack of analysis, and the answers to some defense questions are not clear, and the graphic representation is not standardized.
4. Students use dreamweave and access database technology to design Ganzi tourism website. The design is fresh and beautiful, the main questions are answered accurately, and the basic concepts are clear. I want to correct the database storage problem in the file.
5. Students have good professional quality, can answer questions fluently and have a high correct rate. He has a good understanding of the problems encountered in the implementation process and a good grasp of time. It would be better if he could implement it in a relatively new operating environment.
6. The student explained the design details of the database in detail, did in-depth research, and independently completed the design of the forum. He has certain scientific research ability, clear thinking in answering questions and concise and smooth answers. After careful discussion, the defense team agreed that the student's performance was good, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the paper.
7. In the one-minute presentation, the student introduced the main idea, content and structure of the paper, as well as the writing process of the paper. The organization was clear, there were no big mistakes in language, and the teacher's questions were basically answered correctly, which reflected a certain professional quality. However, there are some minor problems in the design process and the flow chart is not perfect. I hope to correct it in time.
8. As can be seen from the defense, this student has a solid professional foundation, is well prepared, is very familiar with the contents of the paper, can concisely and clearly state the design ideas and processes, has a smooth system display, has well-founded answers to questions, has clear basic concepts, and has certain innovations in the paper. I hope to continue to improve some words and symbols in the paper and strive for standardized use.