A paper about returning cooked eggs to chickens exploded on the whole network. This article exploded not because it was well written, but because it seriously violated basic common sense and basic scientific principles. Bad styles and unhealthy trends in academic circles have been encouraged. This incident has experienced a big discussion on the Internet since its exposure, a special investigation by Jilin Publishing Bureau, and the author's apology and resignation today. Basically, it has come to an end, but the root of academic fraud has not been dug up, which is the fundamental reason why this article was discussed by the majority of netizens.

First, this paper seriously violates the basic common sense and principles of science. This article says that boiled eggs can produce hatched chicks through experiments, but the content of this article is only through the human mind, and this experiment uses human evidence, not specific experimental data. This is simply treating the vast number of netizens and those who seriously engage in scientific research and academics as monkeys. Moreover, the content of this article seriously violates the basic principles of science and is completely untenable.

Secondly, this paper reveals the unhealthy trend in academic circles. Such articles can be published not only because of the authors and reviewers, but also because of the editors who buy and sell papers through intermediaries. Once this article was published, it caused a heated discussion among netizens, and public opinion further pressured Jilin Publishing Bureau to set up a special investigation team to conduct a special investigation on the geography of magazine photos. It can be seen that the state still attaches great importance to academic fraud and improper means of buying and selling papers.

Third, I hope this article can give a warning to the academic circle, and write papers seriously to engage in academics, instead of engaging in some crooked ways. No matter from which point of view, this article is completely untenable, but it can appear in a provincial journal, indicating that this article must have been published by some unknown means. Now this article has been exposed by netizens, hoping to give a warning to people in the scientific research circle.