People's Daily: A paper entitled "Teachers' Sense of Sublime and Teachers' Mother's Sense of Gracefulness" was withdrawn after seven years. Vast and flattering works not only destroy the seriousness of core journals, but also greatly waste academic resources and dampen the credibility of academic circles. These papers are unimpeded, and it is obviously difficult to convince the public that "the review is not strict" and "the positioning is inconsistent". Only by deeply reflecting on the relationship between academic monopoly and nepotism can we avoid turning academic rectification into laughter.

China Youth Daily: Apart from those dazzling words, what is the inevitable connection between this research and Heihe Project? Have you deviated from the contents set in the project plan? How much research funds did he get for the "9 1 1250 19" project? These questions still need to be answered by fund management departments, fund use departments and scholars involved.

Beijing News: If such an extremely flattering article describing "the noble feeling of the tutor" and "the graceful feeling of the teacher's mother" can continue to exist as the core journal standard, it will be a kind of black humor for graduate students who are anxious and have hair loss for publishing their papers.

Depth analysis

(1) Why do you want to kiss the tutor's ass?

1. Interest relationship

Throughout the academic history of ancient and modern times, academic factions formed by different schools have been fighting endlessly, but a set of strict structures, even grades, have been formed within the schools. Today, teachers are not only an academic circle, but also an interest body. What is connected with it is not only the similar purport and way of thinking in academic research, but also communication.