1, the manuscript has a certain academic level.
In the early stage, editors will screen out some manuscripts that obviously do not meet the requirements of journals or have low research quality, which makes the articles entering the final stage have certain potential. Therefore, the articles entering the final review have certain advantages.
2. Periodicals also have a certain publishing demand.
In order to maintain a good academic reputation and influence, journals usually strive to select high-quality papers for publication, so as to promote academic exchanges and research progress. Therefore, journals also have a certain willingness to pass the final review for manuscripts that meet the theme and quality requirements of journals.
3. Revise and reply to peer review comments.
In the process of preliminary examination and review, the reviewer can make suggestions on the revision and improvement of the paper. The author should take these opinions seriously and make appropriate amendments and answers. If the author can reasonably respond to and solve the questions and opinions of the reviewers, it will play a positive role in improving the quality of the paper and increase the probability of passing the final review.
Links to periodic reviews:
1, first trial
The preliminary examination is the stage of preliminary screening of submissions. Editors will carefully check whether the manuscript conforms to the discipline scope and format requirements of the journal and whether it conforms to the basic academic norms. If the manuscript obviously does not meet the requirements or the quality is low, it may be rejected directly. After the first trial is passed, the editor will distribute the qualified manuscripts to experts in the corresponding fields.
2. Expert review
In the expert review session, the editor will invite senior scholars with professional knowledge in this field to review. The judging experts will make a comprehensive academic evaluation of the manuscript, including the innovation of content, academic value, scientific method and reliability of data. They will put forward their own opinions and suggestions and write comments and feedback to the editor.
3. Final review
If the manuscript has passed the expert review, but some suggestions are put forward in the review comments, the author needs to modify it according to the suggestions and submit it to the editor for final review. In the final stage, the editor will review the revised manuscript again to ensure that the revision has been handled according to the review opinions, and finally confirm the research content. If the final review is passed, the manuscript will be accepted for publication.