1 The student well stated the purpose, theoretical and practical significance of writing the paper, expounded the main points and contents of the paper, and introduced the writing process of the paper. The thinking is clear, but the understanding of the logical structure of this paper is not deep enough. The statement is concise and to the point, which shows that you have a certain understanding of the problem under study. However, reading the lecture notes many times in the elaboration seems to be insufficient preparation. The student's answer to the teacher's first question is accurate; The student answered the question about the source of information truthfully, but in some places in the paper, he didn't specify the source of data ... The answer to the second question is obviously not relevant enough, and the teacher's oral question may not be clear ... The student's answer to the third question is satisfactory, but there are some language errors ... After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked him to do so.
The student fluently stated the purpose, theoretical and practical significance of the thesis writing, expounded the main viewpoints and contents of the thesis, and introduced the writing process of the thesis. Clear logical thinking and fluent language. For the teacher's first question, the students only gave a basically correct answer under the teacher's inspiration. For the second question, the answer is concise and satisfactory. For the third question, the answer is not exact enough, and there are obvious mistakes ... The student's defense language is fluent (not as fluent as other students) ... After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed (still agreed) to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked him to revise some .../make ... the revision of the thesis.
In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main points, content and structure of the paper, and the writing process of the paper. The organization is clear and the language is correct, but sometimes he has to read the lecture notes, so he is not fully prepared. For the first question raised by the teacher, the students gave a basically correct answer only under the inspiration of the teacher. The students' answer to the teacher's second question is basically correct, but it is virtually revealed that it is not a clerical error to write a tragic belief as a tragic fate. For the third question, the students' answer is satisfactory, but there are some language errors. In terms of pronunciation and intonation, survival lies in several problems. Fluency is not the same as other students in a defense group. After careful discussion, the defense team still agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked the student to correct some language errors left in the thesis.
Comment 4 1 of graduation thesis defense group. The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance).
The student has a strong ability to consult documents, collect information about the examination system comprehensively, and have a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge. The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions. The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.
2. This paper studies xxxxx, which has strong practical value and provides a new basis for xxxxx. The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results. The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.
3. The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the knowledge learned is used comprehensively to solve the problem. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent. The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.
4. The student's thesis conforms to the current reality, which has certain theoretical value and practical significance, but it is not reasonable enough in structure. I hope I can revise and agree to open the topic.
5. Wang Rui's thesis "Electronic Password Lock Based on FPGA Technology" has completed the research (design) task specified in the task book. Using EDA technology, the digital password lock is designed by top-down design method. The overall structure, main functions, design flow, module division and VHDL source program of each module of the digital password lock are described, and the simulation results of digital password lock design are given. The translation of foreign language materials is acceptable, the paper format is basically standardized, the discussion is basically accurate, the expected requirements are met, and the requirements for the defense of bachelor's degree thesis are met.