It is said that the ancients were very trustworthy, which can be seen from various proverbs and stories left by the ancients. As the saying goes, "A word spoken by a gentleman cannot be recalled." This is about how to deal with the results of what you say and do. Such a person can usually be called a gentleman. However, even in ancient times, it was very hard to be a gentleman, sometimes even at the cost of life. For example, Guan Yunchang's body was in Cao Cao's heart in the Han Dynasty. If I hadn't met Cao Cao, it's hard to say whether Guan Yunchang would pay the price of his life in order to keep the three wishes of Taoyuan. It can also be seen that Cao Cao, who has always appeared as a white face in Chinese dramas, is really a gentleman who stresses faithfulness. Although he said he would rather I was negative than negative, he actually wanted to be a gentleman at a critical moment, at least he didn't want to be a gentleman killer.
On the contrary, it is much easier to be a villain than a gentleman. Accidental betrayal will bear a bad reputation at most, but sometimes it will make him successful. Guan Yunchang, who looks very trustworthy, is not very glorious on the Jingzhou issue. He not only followed Liu Bei's treachery and refused to return the Jingzhou he had borrowed, but also had the cheek to go to the meeting alone, which was quite heroic. Actually, it's cheating I have never understood why almost everyone is talking about what Liu Bei and Guan Yunchang have done, thinking that they are a big scam and depicting Lu Su, who tried to impress Liu Bei with credit, as a fool. Therefore, even a great man is sometimes a gentleman and a villain. But it is not difficult to find that there are always more gentlemen than villains in ancient times, and what villains do is often shameful. The ancients were very capable of distinguishing this.
Today, modern people seem to have raised their credit standards, and tend to say where the hero Mo Wen came from. If credit was priceless in ancient times, then in the eyes of modern people, credit has begun to have a price, and sometimes it is even clearly marked. For example, many service industries are very keen to make various commitments and write them down in black and white. This kind of credit is valuable. At the same time, it also shows the decline of the credibility of the whole modern people! This is actually quite scary! When we bought a handful of vegetables in the vegetable market, we were faced with a brand of "pollution-free vegetables". The promise of this food stall means that there is no pesticide residue, which actually shows that the whole vegetable market is a huge market for selling pesticides. At this time, the price of the promised food stall is higher than others, which is the price of credit. In fact, this credit price has another embodiment. It is said that a rice shop sells rice with a small bag of sand in order to distinguish rice from sand in his house. This merchant directly reflects the value of sand, rather than mixing it with rice, at least it reflects its modesty. Because, at this time, his credit was challenged by interests. If he doesn't cooperate, his interests will be damaged in business competition.
This is of course an extreme example. The conclusion of modern people's credit corruption is of course arbitrary, but its crisis is obvious. The most direct manifestation of this crisis is the interest-oriented trend of emotions between people, such as the credit of marriage. I think the so-called premarital property justice, which can reflect modern people's sense of independence, is actually a doubt about the credibility of marriage itself. Man is a perceptual animal. When marriage can use such strict legal procedures to regulate each other's external things, the value of people themselves has taken a back seat, and it is only a symbol of some property owners. The decline in the credit of marriage is accompanied by the decline in the credit of friends. From the utilitarian point of view, we should weigh the distance between people and make use of friends such as fellow villagers, classmates and colleagues around us. It is difficult for people to associate with this gentleman's statement. After all, it's just an interest alliance. Once interests deviate from one's desires, friendship will collapse.
One thing is the same as in ancient times, it is always much easier to be a villain than a gentleman, because a villain does not have to bear the cost of spending credit, but a gentleman must put this budget into his life. Does this mean that modern people have some kind of villain tendency? Smart businessmen will change their accumulated credit into more money wisely, while it is said that a kind of modern people with modern consciousness will package their credit and be alert to others' credit. Another kind of modern people are repeating the story of Guan Yunchang riding thousands of miles alone. They paid a terrible price, even their lives, to defend their credit. This kind of person has become a modern nursery rhyme and is regarded as a laughing stock.
Sean was born in South Korea (now central Henan) during the Warring States Period. He is Liu Bang's strategist, and he has made a lot of achievements in advising him. He was the founding father of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Liu Bang proclaimed himself emperor after destroying Xiang Yu and establishing the Han Dynasty. In the sixth year of Emperor Gaozu (20 BC1), he was a great hero. Gao Zu said, "In strategic planning, the winner is thousands of miles away, and the ovary is also", and Zhang Liang chose 30,000 households as fiefs. Sean dared not accept it, saying, "I left it when I first met the emperor. Seal me up and stay. " Therefore, Sean is called Liu Hou. Sean is ill. In his later years, he hid in the city and sealed the land. After his death, he was buried on Weishan Island in the east of Liucheng. Now, there is a big village in front of the tomb, called "the village in front of the tomb".
When Cao Cao gave Guan Yu a new robe, Guan Yu was still wrapped in an old robe outside. Cao asked him why he didn't throw away his old robe. Guan Yu said that although it was old, it was given by his brother (Liu Bei) and could not be thrown away.
Guan Yu went through five customs and beheaded six generals just to see Liu Bei. Let alone Cao Cao's acceptance of his kindness (Guan Yu's red hare was given by Cao Cao)
Zhao Zilong Changbanpo fought to save the young master.
The death of Dian Wei, the savior of Changsha, is a sign of loyalty.