First, the idea of examining the topic: "rules" in the dictionary means "drawing two kinds of stationery, which is a metaphor for a certain standard, norm and convention". The introduction of the topic comes from Mencius' famous saying "If you don't obey the rules, you won't be Fiona Fang". The original meaning is that regular circles and squares cannot be drawn without compasses and a ruler for finding right angles. Words similar to "rules" have the meaning of "norms". For example, legal system, school rules and regulations, family education rules, rules and regulations, code of conduct, discipline rules, traffic rules, competition rules, game rules, literary works creation rules, civilized conventions, moral norms ... but the thoughts, theories, laws, practices and laws of natural and social operation of predecessors do not belong to the category of rules. Many students have misunderstood here, for example, they think that "the law of conservation of the universe" is a law. Aristotle's wrong theory about heavy objects falling to the ground is a law, and classical mechanics theory is a law ... So students think that advanced theories such as Copernicus's "Heliocentrism" and Darwin's "Evolution" are all produced after breaking the original rules. For example, a classmate wrote: "The great physicist Newton started thinking from a falling apple and finally came to the law of gravity. If he follows the rule that apples will fall like normal people, we will never get gravity. " Second, writing skills: (1) parallel structure-central argument: no rules can create a society. Sub-argument 1: Political life needs rules. Sub-argument 2: Economic life needs rules. Sub-argument 3: Cultural life needs rules. (2) Hierarchical structure-central argument: rules need it. It needs careful formulation. Sub-argument 2: Rules need to be strictly enforced. Sub-argument 3: Rules need to be constantly updated. The three sub-arguments start from the attitude angles of the three periods before, during and after the formulation of the rules, and the thinking is very clear. (3) Positive and negative contrast argument-central argument: it is necessary to advocate obeying the rules and breaking them. Sub-argument 1: Only society can be orderly and harmonious. Sub-argument 2: But everyone sticks to the rules and doesn't know how to change, which hinders the progress and development of society. (4) Integrated structure-central argument: live in the rules and break through the rules. Another: About rules In the minds of other parents, when children are naive, rules may not be so important. They thought they could cultivate it slowly in the future, but my mother gave it to me since I was a child. One day, my mother took me to the West Lake to play, because I forgot to bring a garbage bag and held a used napkin in my hand, which was not very comfortable. Suddenly I saw a trash can from a distance, but it stinks just because it is full. I grabbed my nose and threw the garbage in my hand into the trash can like a shot. I immediately ran back to my mother, only to see her frowning and saying to me, "Go and pick it up." So, I said, "It stinks there ..." But my mother said, "If everyone knows this, the trash can is full of rubbish. Why do you need a trash can? Go and check! " I was shocked to see my gentle mother become so strict. Is it not just a napkin? Why did my mother lose such a big temper? Helpless, I had to move to the stinking trash can step by step. I turned my head and picked up the garbage. I was about to throw it into the bucket when my mother said, "wait a minute, the trash can is full." Let's throw it somewhere else. " As a result, my mother and I walked a lot to find the trash can. That day, I never understood my mother's intention. As I grew older, I finally understood the rules that I only knew when I was a child. My mother gave me rules from an early age and cultivated me to form good habits. Now the consciousness and behavior of civilization have become my instinct and habit. Really want to thank mom!