1. Topic relevance: Reviewers need to ensure that the topic of the paper is consistent with the positioning and scope of the journal, and avoid publishing articles unrelated to the theme of the journal.
2. Research methods: Reviewers should pay attention to whether the author adopts appropriate research methods to ensure the scientific and reliable research. At the same time, we should pay attention to whether the author has fully described and explained the research methods so that readers can understand and reproduce the research.
3. Data and results: Reviewers need to pay attention to whether the data provided by the author is accurate, complete and reliable, and whether the analysis results are reasonable. In addition, we should also pay attention to whether the author has fully analyzed and discussed the data and provided enough evidence to support his conclusion.
4. Literature review: Reviewers should pay attention to whether the author has made a comprehensive literature review on the research in related fields in order to understand the research background and current situation. At the same time, we should pay attention to whether the author has properly quoted and evaluated the literature.
5. Structure and language of the paper: The reviewer should pay attention to whether the structure of the paper is clear, whether the logic is strict, whether the language is fluent and whether the expression is accurate. In addition, we should also pay attention to whether the author follows the format requirements of the journal.
6. Innovation and academic value: the reviewer should pay attention to the innovation of the paper, that is, whether the author has put forward new ideas, methods or discoveries. At the same time, we should pay attention to the academic value of the paper, that is, whether the paper can promote the research and development in related fields.
7. Ethical issues: reviewers need to pay attention to whether the paper conforms to ethical norms, such as experimental design, data processing, and paper publication.
8. Other problems: Reviewers should also pay attention to whether there are other problems in the paper, such as plagiarism and repeated publication.
In short, the evaluation of core journals needs to pay attention to many aspects to ensure the quality and academic value of papers. Reviewers should maintain an objective and fair attitude in the process of reviewing manuscripts and make contributions to improving the academic level and influence of journals.