After the initial difficulties of the epidemic, we can all realize the shortage of domestic medical resources and admit that if left unchecked, there will be various medical runs. However, after several visits to Xi 'an and Shanghai, we should also admit that the domestic administrative resources are also insufficient, and insisting on the removal will lead to a run on people's livelihood management. If you think something is wrong when you see Xi 'an, then you have to understand that this is almost the upper limit you can reach when you see Shanghai (only referring to the management work after the city is closed).
No matter how much you scold Shanghai, you should be able to admit that Shanghai is already the top administrative resource in China, and the quality of grass-roots administrative staff is also the top in China. If one of the best cities in China cannot guarantee adequate food and medical care in closed cities, then we must admit that as long as the cities are closed, these secondary disasters will inevitably occur. It's like admitting that as long as it's on, someone will die of the epidemic. Both are reality, one is restricted by the upper limit of manpower, material resources and energy, and the other is restricted by the reality of virus. It is an oversimplified and idealistic view to admit that the epidemic will kill people and not to admit that the closure of the city will inevitably have some irreversible consequences.
It is not wrong to say that managers at all levels ignore superior laws and regulations and people's livelihood, which makes it difficult to sell vegetables and see a doctor, but at least it is biased. These managers don't live in a vacuum. They have old people who need to see a doctor and children who brush Zhihu. Who can say that they must only look at the number of confirmed cases they control, but they don't care about people's livelihood? It's just that manpower is always poor. It's easy to simply pursue the goal of closing the city, but it's so difficult to balance closing the city and people's livelihood.
I hope that when we discuss whether to reset or save, we should stop thinking that only * * * can save a life, and clearing only means enjoyment and money loss. Clearing the scene is not the moral high ground, and saving people is not necessarily a disregard for human life.