Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to construct the general framework of my thesis?
How to construct the general framework of my thesis?
Briefly summarize four contents: the importance and purpose of the research topic, the main contents and methods of the research, the conclusions drawn from the research and the significance of the research results. ?

Summarize the papers related to the research topic at home and abroad and express them in your own words. The current research situation includes: main academic viewpoints, previous research achievements and research level, focus of debate, existing problems and possible reasons.

Please remember that no matter what methods and means you use, the first goal of writing a paper is to establish your own framework, that is, to determine the general catalogue of the paper. Next, let's take a look at what a complete framework looks like!

1. Summary

The standard summary consists of five sentences, including five levels:

1. 1 Introduction: Why do you want to do this research? At present, the research in this field is lacking or has made some achievements, but there are shortcomings;

1.2 method: what method is used to do this research;

1.3 data: what kind of data are used to verify your method;

1.4 conclusion: what conclusions have been drawn from the study;

Significance of 1.5: What is the significance of the conclusion to the research field and practice (theoretical and practical significance)?

Step 2 introduce

2. 1 research background: the purpose is to confirm the importance of this research question. If the losses caused by such problems are very serious, it is very important to study this problem.

2.2 Research questions: What questions (or aspects) should be studied under the above research background; Under the above research background, what aspects can this study solve the existing practical problems?

2.3 Research Status: What others have done, what others have done and what problems have been found?

2.4 What are the problems and deficiencies in the existing research? What have others not done? Why didn't others do better? It also shows that the lack of these studies will bring serious consequences.

2.5 Purpose and scope of this study: What shortcomings of these problems (problems that have not been done or done well) have been made up by this study, and what research methods have been used to make up for them. State the limitations of this study and highly summarize the conclusions of this paper.

2.6 article structure: the basic content structure of the subsequent part of this article.

3. Literature review.

Literature review proves and explains two points: first, the setting of research objectives is meaningful; Secondly, the method you adopted in this study is reliable and effective. Includes three levels of content:

3. 1 reason for choosing the topic (research problem you found): that is, for the research problem that is not done well or not done well, it is meaningful to let readers know about this research in this research field;

3.2 What are the contents worthy of reference in the existing literature, including analytical tools and achievements;

3.3 What is worth learning from unrelated or adjacent research fields, focusing on the research methods that can be used for reference.

Note: 3.2 and 3.3 determine the research methods. Supplementary note: pay attention to the difference between the research purpose and the research scope in introduction 2.5. Scope: If there are 10 follow-up problems after the flood, this study only considers 6 key problems. The scope should be explained and discriminated in literature reviews 3. 1 and 3.2, which is why I left these six questions and removed the other four questions. Summary: Literature review is not a review of literature, but a discovery of problems, not a review. It is not a detailed description and summary of all relevant literature, but a high summary of the relevant research status. So far, the research questions, research objectives and research methods have been clarified, and have been proved and defended.

4. Method

This part mainly introduces the methods. It includes three aspects:

4. 1 research strategy: summarize the research process. What kind of research strategy should be adopted to do such research: that is, the research ideas adopted.

4.2 Method of data collection: What kind of data (variables) need to be collected on the basis of in-depth understanding of the research problem. The concept of data here is broad, not specific data, but includes data structure and variables (factors to be considered).

4.3 Data analysis method:

Such as mathematical analysis, logical analysis (reasoning), statistical model and other data analysis methods. Statistical model (model establishment, model verification (model calculation), model inference (some results inferred during calculation), model evaluation and comparison).