Today's famous saying has a new theory: three rescues a day, disloyal to the overall situation of the four modernizations? There is no innovation in communicating with domestic and foreign counterparts? Will it be implemented after winning the prize?
Who is the "new three provinces theory" you are talking about? Professor Lu Jiaxi, one of the founders of structural chemistry in China and former president of China Academy of Sciences.
He always talks modestly about his old Lu in the three northeastern provinces. He is really a loyal man of the four modernizations. Poor family and inspirational. Lu Jiaxi, a young boy, is very talented and smart. He entered Xiamen University before he was thirteen, but he was not as good as the weak champion. When I was studying in Britain and America, I designed the inverted Yi Tu with CP factor, which was praised as "Lushi table" by the international X-ray crystallography community. It was widely used for decades and was not replaced by electronic computers until recent years.
/kloc-returned to China at the end of 0/945 and worked hard to cultivate a group of talents. 1956 has been included in the first batch of the youngest first-class professors in China. In the early 1960s, he personally founded Fuzhou University and fujian institute of research on the structure, and led the institute to achieve a number of important scientific research results.
The study of transition metal clusters is a profound basic theory in the field of structural chemistry, and little has been done internationally. Once it breaks through, it will deeply benefit the national economy and people's livelihood. Therefore, Lu Jiaxi put forward the idea of chemically simulating biological nitrogen fixation in 197 1, and then he and Professor Cai put forward the atomic cluster model and Xiamen model of nitrogen fixation active center respectively. Therefore, the idea of China scholars about the atomic cluster model of nitrogen-fixing active center is four years earlier than that of western developed countries.
2. A young man trudged on the long road of life. When he arrived at a ferry, he had seven backpacks: health, beauty, honesty, alertness, wisdom, money and honor. When the ferry set off, it was calm, and I can't tell how long it took. The wind is rough, the boat is bumpy and dangerous. Shaogong said: "The ship is small and heavy, and the guest officer must abandon a backpack to tide over the difficulties safely." Seeing that no young people are willing to give up, Shao Gong said, "If you give up, you will get something." The young man thought for a moment and threw "honesty" into the water.
In the fable, "honesty" has been abandoned. What does this remind you of? Please write an article on the topic of "honesty". You can write your own experiences, experiences, opinions and beliefs, as well as stories and fables.
Honesty and credit are really good things, which sounds more touching than beauty, money, honor, alertness, health and talent. If I were you, I wouldn't throw it away. There are many things to throw away. Why do you want to lose this basic principle of being a man? The crux of the problem lies in what good faith can bring to people.
If honesty is a necessity for a survival group, it is not an exaggeration for most people to have at least this quality; If honesty becomes a "luxury", those who own it will be unlucky-human beings have the instinct to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. In the circle where * * * lives together, you have something that others don't. ...
The Analects of Confucius recorded the words of Ceng Zi, a student in Kong Laoer: Visit three times a day, be unfaithful to others, make friends with disbelief and be unaccustomed. This Ceng Zi, because of his three sentences, has been praised countless times, because his words can be regarded as the program of honesty. I have to admit that these words are beautiful, a bit like a saint, although he can't reach the status of a saint.
But if you think about it carefully, only in a society where honesty is not universal will someone reflect on these basic problems. Is it possible to "be unfaithful to others", "make friends untrustworthy" and "carry on the family line"? Why is it necessary for people close to "saints" to reflect on these things? Reflection is because we don't. If everyone has integrity, wouldn't Ceng Zi's statement seem redundant and ridiculous? In my opinion, this is more like a gesture than a real living example.
Imagine, if there is a system that can't make honest people get corresponding benefits, then who will try to own it?
Imagine again, if there is a system that can ensure that people with integrity benefit and those without integrity suffer (the size of the disaster depends on the degree of dishonesty), then who dares to have no integrity?
Honesty is social and can only be guaranteed by the system.
The crux of the problem is how to have such a good system. Do we have to wait until everyone's interests are harmed before we regret it? Will people who make fake rat poison never have mice at home? Does the person who makes poisonous rice promise never to drink poisonous wine? ……
I don't know, all I know is that I don't doubt my honesty, but I am ambivalent. I have seen too many examples where my good wishes run counter to each other ... If I take this road, I am like this now, and I will still be like this in the future, and I will probably give up.
Honesty is a luxury, but fortunately, I still have it for the time being, and I don't intend to throw it away at present. I can be a little proud-this thing can only be used for narcissism.
Virtual Marker: I always knew that Wang Xiaoshan was very reasonable, but I didn't know he was so reasonable. I almost nodded at his fallacy. When reading Wang Xiaoshan's articles, I kept reminding myself that you can't read more Wang Xiaoshan's articles. If you read too much, you will inevitably doubt yourself.