The following are the comments on my undergraduate graduation design papers. Welcome to read them for reference. I hope you like it!

The first part: Excellent comments on undergraduate graduation design papers.

Teacher's point of view: The author discusses the role orientation of teachers in student-centered oral English teaching. The topic selection has strong practical significance, the argument is correct, the argument is conclusive, the discussion is clear, and the paper meets the requirements of the specification. Throughout the design and writing of the thesis, the author's attitude towards academics is extremely rigorous and serious.

Peer experts' comments: It is of great practical significance to deeply understand the theory and practice of oral English teaching. The argument is correct and conclusive, and the paper meets the requirements of standardization.

Opinion of the defense team: The student can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and respond quickly, think clearly and express accurately when answering questions. Agree to assess as? Excellent? Wait a minute.

Liang Hao

Tutor's point of view: This student paper discusses the importance of English teacher's role by analyzing the nature and characteristics of English teaching. By comparing the traditional teaching mode with the modern teaching mode in China, this paper probes into the roles and qualities that teachers should have under the new teaching mode. The article has clear arguments, distinct levels and rigorous structure.

Peer experts' comments: Based on the analysis of the characteristics and essence of English teaching, this paper discusses the role of English teachers in the student-centered teaching model. The topic is appropriate, the argument is prominent, and the discussion is more sufficient.

Opinion of the defense team: The student can explain the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and can answer the questions related to the paper properly. Agree with the student tutor's opinion, and the paper score is? Okay？ .

middle rank

Tutor's point of view: This paper discusses the potential obstacles in cross-cultural communication and puts forward a series of suggestions to improve the communication effect. The author can master the basic theory and think about cross-cultural communication. The full text has reasonable structure, clear organization and fluent language expression. But generally speaking, the research is not deep enough, the analysis is abstract, and the demonstration and examples are not sufficient.

Peer experts' comments: This paper discusses the potential obstacles in cross-cultural communication from five aspects, and puts forward some suggestions to overcome these obstacles from four aspects. The discussion is too broad and lacks empirical evidence.

Opinion of the defense team: the student can describe the main contents of the paper in English within the specified time, and can generally answer the questions raised without principled mistakes. The defensive score is medium.

surname

Tutor's opinion: This paper mainly analyzes the heroine in The Sun Also Rises from two aspects: external image, words and deeds, and makes a qualitative analysis of her at that time. New woman? . The overall structure of the article is reasonable and the level is basically clear, but the language expression needs to be improved and the argument needs to be deepened. Basically meet the requirements of bachelor's degree thesis, and agree that the student will participate in the defense. Peer experts' comments: This paper analyzes the heroine in The Sun Also Rises, and thinks that she can be regarded as one of the heroines at that time in terms of external image, words and deeds? New woman? . The article has a reasonable structure and clear views. However, the language expression needs to be improved and the discussion needs to be deepened, which basically meets the requirements of bachelor's degree thesis.

Opinion of the defense team: the main contents of the paper can be stated within the specified time, but the organization is not clear enough, and the answers to some main questions are not appropriate enough, but supplementary explanations can be made after being prompted. The student's defense score is passing.

The second part: Requirements for the comments of instructors, reviewers, defense teams and defense committees on undergraduate graduation design papers.

The opinions of tutors, reviewers, defense teams and defense committees should be specific and detailed, not in a few words or in the same way. Please be sure to write specific opinions according to the situation of papers and defense. The specific opinions are as follows:

First of all, the tutor's comments

The basic contents shall include:

1. A description of students' study discipline and work attitude, and a description of students' basic theoretical and practical abilities and scientific research abilities;

2. Completion of topic selection: including workload, authenticity, main problems solved, whether the paper is innovative, whether it has certain practical application value or academic research theoretical value;

3. Whether the writing of the thesis (design) is standardized;

Finally, please describe whether you agree to participate in the thesis defense and give the evaluation results.

Second, review the teacher's comments:

The basic contents shall include:

1. Evaluation of the completion and workload of the selected project;

2. Evaluate the innovation, practical application value and academic value of the paper;

3. Evaluation of the writing level of the thesis (design);

4. Finally, please describe whether you have reached the level and requirements of undergraduate thesis (design), whether you agree to participate in thesis defense, and give the evaluation results.

Three. Opinion of the defense team:

The basic contents shall include:

1. Evaluation of the completion of the selected topic and the application value or academic value of the paper (design);

2. A description of the student's defense process, including: whether the student's description of the question is correct and clear, whether the content organization is sufficient, and whether the answers to the scientific questions raised are accurate;

3. Finally, please make it clear whether you have passed the thesis defense and give the evaluation results.

Four. Opinions of the National Defense Commission:

The basic contents shall include:

1. Overall evaluation of the content, application value or academic value of the paper (design);

2. Overall evaluation of students' defense process;

3. Finally, please make it clear: after discussion, the defense committee * * agreed, * * opposed and * * abstained, thinking that the student's thesis (failed) reached the level of bachelor's degree thesis, and (failed) passed the thesis defense, suggesting that the student be awarded a bachelor's degree (or re-defended after revising the thesis) and given a comprehensive evaluation grade.

Verb (abbreviation of verb) Note:

1. Comments cannot be simple and hasty; Do not meet the requirements of the specification should be rewritten;

2. Comments must be handwritten, can't be patched, can't be revised repeatedly, and must be in place at one time (if the graduation thesis instructions are not filled in according to the specifications and need to be revised greatly, they can be reprinted in electronic version);

3. Strictly put an end to similar comments and handwriting.

Chapter III: Comments on Undergraduate Graduation Design Thesis 1. Comments: The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to the XXXXX paper writing standard. The title of the paper is very good and creative. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work. It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The language is also very sharp, and the paper is clear-headed, well-founded, with unique views, which has certain reference value and can be regarded as a good article.

2. Comments: The topic of the paper is meaningful. On the basis of absorbing academic research results, it is reasonable to have your own experience and put forward your own views. The argument is correct, the material is substantial, the narrative is clear and logical. Clear pronunciation and mellow voice are extremely smooth. Writing conforms to academic norms. In the future, we should further sum up experience, compare music education modes and teach music better. The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis. Comments: The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the knowledge learned is comprehensively used to solve problems. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent. In the future, we should further sum up experience and compare moral education models, so that moral education can be carried out better. The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.

3. Comments: This paper studies XXXX, which has strong practical value and provides a new basis for controlling accounting information distortion. The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results. The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.

4. Comments: The title of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language. Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes. The author tried to learn from Lev? Looking for the connection between Tolstoy and a character in Cao Yu's novels. From the content, the author has a further understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials. How to draw your own conclusion through the analysis of the data is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author has made great efforts.