Argumentative writing

Characteristics (of language)

The center is distinct and prominent, and the article is scientific.

Gender, organization, accuracy

: ① Accurate and rigorous; ② Generality and conciseness; (3) Use rhetoric to express its vivid, vivid and emotional words.

Methods and functions

Give an example (make an article more specific, more convincing, and explain something more objectively) Give an example to demonstrate (specifically and forcefully demonstrate the point of view and enhance the persuasiveness of the article)

Metaphor (to enhance the vividness and vividness of explanation) Metaphor argument (to demonstrate the point of view vividly and make the article easy to understand.

Accept. )

For comparison.

Contrastive argumentation (highlighting and comprehensively demonstrating viewpoints), enumerating figures (making things to be explained accurate) and reasoning (effectively demonstrating viewpoints and enhancing the authority and persuasiveness of articles).

1. Total-minutes-total 2. Total -3 minutes. One minute.-Four minutes in all. Progressives

(from shallow to deep, from surface to inside, from phenomenon to essence)

1. Story-like beginning 2. Step by step structure 3. Point to example 4. Hypothetical analysis 5.

A thoughtful ending

Question 1. Understand the explanatory objects and features 1. Extract the central argument of the second article. Identify and understand the interpretation method II. The function of analysis and demonstration method. Analyze and understand the order of interpretation.

3. The way the article puts forward the central argument 4. Analysis of the structural characteristics of the fourth section. Types and functions of independent variables 5. The generalization of text meaning, layer meaning and paragraph meaning.

5. Analyze the function of paragraph structure

6. Keywords, key sentences and

Comment on its expressive function. Analyze the argumentation ideas of the article.

7. Explain the experience of language accuracy

7. Analysis of the characteristics of argumentative language