(1) hieroglyphics of ancient boxes &; Ideographic characters;

(2) profound farming economic civilization;

(3) Deep religious civilization/belief with Confucianism as the axis and harmonious integration of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism;

④ Bright, healthy and unique oriental social system &; Humanistic spirit, artistic attainments and even the great philosophy of heaven and earth where people live.

Sorry, please forgive me for selling it privately:

Refuting Li Congguo's "master" of China's economic ownership and talking about secrets-"Sansheng economy" looking for "Gui Li"

The so-called "[political/official/civilian] classics" by Master Gui Gui can be described as "thundering" to all beings, which is too grandstanding. On the surface, its "Sansheng" economic analysis method seems completely self-evident and impeccable. However, if you carefully analyze the classification method of "Sansheng Economy" in Li Congguo's "Sansheng Economy" (hereinafter referred to as Wen Li), you can clearly find that its "Sansheng Economy" can actually be "grafted" on any economic fruit tree, and it is not based on economics. Only the specious western subjective materialism philosophy can "explain" the "achievements" of its "research" on China's economy, which is truly authentic, totally demagogic and grandstanding, and makes people suspect that "scholars" (not economists) are "controlling" the Phoenix! ) also! ......

First, in fact, Wen Li just grafted the theory of Confucius and Mencius to modern economics (China) after 2500 years. He is not smarter or more innovative than Confucius and Zhong Ni, and his complicated and protracted whole article only needs 4-5 words-"Confucius Economics/Zhong Ni Economics"!

First, steal the concept and steal the column by force. When talking about "truth", Wen Lixian made a guilty and contemptible "prerequisite" statement, and when "commenting" his brilliant theory of truth, he must not use economics (in short, obviously he thinks this is not truth either)! Then, we can't help asking, is it more scientific and closer to the truth than economics to discuss shocking economic theories with "Taoism"? ! Is his theory of world glory really true and can't be tested by "non-truth economics"? ! The reason is self-evident.

Secondly, when referring to the (golden perfection) "(capitalist) market economy, Wen Li bluntly said: ... is the crystallization of human (especially western) civilization achievements, but the premise of its expression is to completely abandon &; Negative is based on the achievements of Marxist political economy, which was born earlier than "the crystallization of civilization" and also originated in the West. Foundation! This double standard of double dealing &; Conspiracy and arbitrary practices &; The behavior is simply amazing &; What is outrageous is that its "willful" logic, taking what it wants, taking what it wants to give (taking what it wants to believe) and behavior are not only puzzling, but also shameful.

Thirdly, when discussing its "three-generation economy", Wen Li unconsciously adopted global keywords such as "human", and seemed to forget that it was only describing China, which was carved up by it and dubbed "three-generation economy" (unique), so we want to know that since this "three-state" economy exists &; It can be applied to economies/countries all over the world, so why should it classify China's economy in such a "three-life" way? Its attempt &; The intention can be imagined! Worry may be "speculation", but it is still chilling to think about it.

Fourth, presupposing and giving up, doing whatever you want, summarizing the whole, and selectively forgetting are a major feature of Wenli. (1) Have you really forgotten an objective fact? Even the developed capitalist societies/countries in the west (hereinafter referred to as "going west") still have different political and economic interest classes, and they also exist (even bloodier, the democratic choices/options of western-style democracy, such as presidential election/interest struggle, can even safeguard the interests of a certain class at the expense of waging war! ) The upper bureaucratic interest groups are not unique to China? What is the reason why his so-called "politics/officials/people" is the only champion in China? ! (2) Have you really forgotten such a simple objective truth: there is no illusion of perfection in the world, even if it is "sent to the West", it is difficult to achieve a perfect society that has entered the realm, nor does it mean that there are no disadvantaged groups and poor classes? (3) Have you really forgotten that it is not a complicated and concise truth: you can't judge a thing without seeing Mount Tai. Although China (including most countries in the world) may indeed have an economy called "politics/officials/people" by Wen Li (hereinafter referred to as "Li Sansheng"), this does not prevent this great author of wisdom from doing what he should do. Is it in line with the simplicity of human relations & appropriate rational judgment-so as to draw a fair conclusion, which cannot be used as the basis for unilaterally classifying a country's comprehensive economic subject into these three categories? ! What's the point of simply calling China "Li Sansheng"? ! (4) Have you really forgotten the old saying of shattered glass if people don't know-unless you do what you should do? Wen Li hypocritically peddled his "Li Sansheng" with "non-thesis"&; What is the use of "evil thoughts" as an excuse? In vain! As an economist-level doctoral supervisor "celebrity", he shouldn't/won't just show off his knowledge, entertain the public and play hard. We don't agree with his excuse of "only sending WeChat, not papers".

Second, in fact, Wen Li has sinister intentions. It seems that he is helping the central government of China "wipe things-calm the chaos". In fact, he has ulterior motives and is selling his "Li Sansheng" in disguise (in a silent place): China is only a hopeless "political/official/civilian" economy, and it is not (and will never be) a modern economy. From this perspective, Wen Li's seemingly meticulous but flashy bizarre theory is not only absurd, grandstanding, but also insidious and reactionary. It is undoubtedly a stumbling block to the progress of socialist society and the reform of China, and it has undoubtedly become the spokesman of its interest class &; Pawn, but also to maintain &; Consolidate the existence of its elite's defensive interest fortress &; Forever, looking for theoretical weapons, looking for and seems to have found a "historic" major (decadent) basis!

Third, Wen Li's economic theory of resignation and "self-denial and courtesy" is really like chewing wax. It is chewing the end economy of Confucius' humanistic essence (Confucius is a little inferior to Li, but he does nothing about it). Maggots are picking up garbage, and they are really-picking up the teeth and wisdom of saints and selling them with specious, one-sided and false dross to cover up their sinister intentions and nonsense.

Fourth, "Sansheng Economy" Seeking "Gui Li": We might as well seek "Gui Li" (paradox) from its "Sansheng Economy". As appeared in the last Jay Len, Li Wenzhen is thinking that education has become highly scientific & should civilized people accept the cruel so-called "reality" with resignation? ! Just ask people to accept it willingly &; Is it a fait accompli to maintain society (imperfect or even unfair and unreasonable)? I'm afraid its intention is not that simple. Please catch a glimpse of its subtext. China's economy is different from the market economy crystallized by western civilization, and it is a "political/official/people" economy. People are helpless &; Accept it calmly. What can you do if you don't accept, obey or accept your fate? Moreover, his article also talks about "Heaven is supreme" and never forgets to sell its bootleg goods: it is impossible for China to embark on an advanced and civilized market economy like the West. Today, China's economy is a political/official/non-governmental economy-this is an established conclusion and cannot be innovated &; Furthermore, China people are so helpless and backward (or China is inevitable &; The only way out) has to stick to the routine and accept it ... Obviously, the intention of muddling the water, inciting opposition and disturbing people's hearts is obvious. From this point of view, this is an attempt: whether you agree with his view that China's economy is classified as "the third economy [of politics/officials/people]", as long as you accept and integrate a small part of his argumentation method & in this process, some hidden subtext (that is, insidious intentions) will undoubtedly make people understand the road and value orientation of China today & China's economic policy has caused suspicion and disgust-conflict, which has led to people's attention. ...

Fifth, Wen Li unreasonably presupposed the absurd premise at the beginning, that is, the so-called "theory" of economics could not be used to judge the authenticity of his "three lives" theory of economics. It's really strange and outrageous! Such fallacies are not only unreasonable, but also hooligans! Li Wenzhong also shamelessly declared that "this is just WeChat. This is not a paper. Don't be too serious. " Alas, the unscrupulous "home" of China's economics, which runs through China and the West, should entertain kind people like this! This fallacy not only makes him have fun in the carefree and coquettish drama, but also makes him fool the people with vicious banter between his metacarpals (WeChat only. Non-paper I am also a gourd with a thick skin, and I will try my best!

Sixth, in fact, Wen Li has been carefully and painstakingly avoiding in his argument. He is carefully expounding his "primitive" crooked concept of "politics/officials/people's livelihood economy"&; At the time of definition, while he was eloquent, he did not hesitate to spend a lot of money, while timidly sublimated the human civilization of classical economics-philosophy into "Marxist-Leninist works". Reasonable "China characteristics" are miraculously bypassed and circumvented in an almost invisible way. In fact, what is he avoiding and avoiding seriously? To put it bluntly, it is avoiding the root of economic philosophy that should not be bypassed: "the nationality and class nature of any social behavior and consciousness"! It is afraid that once it is mentioned and set foot in it, its beautiful theory will immediately turn into dust like dirt and garbage. ...

Seventh, in fact, for the brazen grandstanding, it is conceivable (I bet) as long as it attracts attention &; You can spread fallacies and heresies by fair means, and you have no dignity to be a teacher &; Scholars are hypocritical, so it can be inferred that if the decline of China-China's military threat theory or the "Three People's Principles" can make China's "three-generation economy" more "hot" or "cold", then economists like Shirley who "learn Chinese and Western" promise to get rid of the "three-generation economy" immediately and are more willing to discuss it instead.

Eighth, annex; Integrity and selflessness-hate evil as hatred; Open and aboveboard-abide by the truth; Advocating science-resisting superstition!

Appendix (Sansheng Economy) Conclusion Please see what Master Gui Li called "Sansheng Economy" [Conclusion]: Being in the thunder pool of Sansheng Economy, the foundation of Sansheng Economy is unshakable, so what we can do personally is to admit the facts and focus on improving our own quality and strengthening our ability to cope with the external environment, rather than changing the external environment. In short, individuals can't change the society, but they can change themselves, actively cultivate themselves, improve their quality, and try their best to make good choices. That's all. Only by diluting the problem of "Sansheng economy" in the broader time and space of the whole life process can we find an expedient measure. It may be the most rational life ethics orientation of contemporary China people to deal with social problems by upgrading themselves, rather than by changing society.