Let's talk about the power of maternal love advocated in Ha. In fact, this is the real child standard. In Kazakhstan's view, maternal love is a completely beautiful thing, which resists evil and has almost no defects. In reality, it really only exists in children's consciousness. We can make a comparison. In Gone with the Wind, there are two characters, Allen and Mammy Black. However, Mammy Black is sometimes an annoying mother-in-law, but if you are familiar with the text, you can know that in Gone with the Wind, the real mother is Mammy Black, and the image of Ellen is indeed Mitchell's imaginary mother. She was symbolic and soon died and disappeared. Ha is equivalent to this. This kind of mother is Harry's fantasy and JK Rowling's own projection. She wants to have it. This book stems from the nostalgia for the childhood in Eden, and it is the mother in the view of complete children. It is also reasonable for someone to trace her back to Andrao Mark, the wife of hector, the Trojan prince, in the Iliad.
Speaking of the popularity of "Ha", my opinion is that this phenomenon means more things about psychology, communication and economics. It will be very difficult to see the popularity of "ha" from the perspective of literature and art. From the text, "ha" is a complex thing produced under the background of the evolution of British culture and European civilization and the development of literature. If traced back, it can be said that Voldemort's image is similar to "Ha", which is evil but not evil enough to be disgusting, while Harry, someone can trace back to "Tom Brown's Schooldays" written by British Thomas Hughes in 1857. I haven't seen it, so it's hard to explain, but Harry's personality is universal. He is rebellious, eager for attention and hates classes. Almost all novels with a little connection with youth have such a character, Dumbledore, and some people compare it to the potential of writing. He is a wizard, but he is gentle and forbearing. He was unconsciously written as his mother. Hagrid's prototype is taken from the mythical Hermes, while Dobby is the traditional elf image in the eyes of Europeans. The water demon in the goblet of fire also comes from Sai Ren in the Odyssey. In Greek mythology, the dragon, hydra Xu Dela, the watchdog Kerbalas and remy martin. It can be said that many magical symbols in Kazakhstan and China have their origins and historical changes. At the same time, two other writers had a great influence on her, namely lewis carroll and J.R.R Tolkien. Someone once compared Alice in Wonderland (1865) with this book, but I think she inherited more spirit than form from her two predecessors.
In addition, there is a realistic reflection in Ha. Mud can be like a nigger, and the messy Ministry of Magic can also be a state machine. Here, reality is realized as a metaphor, which is a form, not an essence. Therefore, Rowling herself is afraid of raising Kazakhstan to the level comparable to Dickens' novels and Jane Eyre, just like Gu Longli. However, it's ridiculous. Some people associate it with the anti-realism tradition since Picasso, Dali and Garcí a Marquez from the witchcraft thinking in Ha, and regard it as a reaction to the current European literary view and religious view, and bring it into the current trend of mysterious writing and primitive worship, which is consistent with the revival of anti-Christian cultures such as witchcraft culture and druidism. The argument is strange, but to put it bluntly, ha!
If you are familiar with the fantasy, gothic and reasoning traditions of English novels and analyze Ha under the background of myths and legends of Northern Europe, Greece, Rome and Celtic, you will clearly see what kind of logic the narrative means and narrative elements in Ha naturally construct the whole text. It can be said that Ha is a wonderful story and a wonderful fantasy, while other so-called meanings after other texts specified by other scholars are unbearable.
I think literary theory should not be explained by theory, but by the natural extension of the text itself. If I write this paper, I will honestly demonstrate why Hagrid is like this, why Voldemort is like this, and why Dumbledore looks a little hesitant and mysterious. Of course, there are also failures in Kazakhstan's narrative, and I think Snape's behavior before and after is inappropriate. It should be at first.
As for the topic, dizzy, I think, as long as you have feelings for the article you wrote, the topic will naturally emerge. Treat my words like my own children, because that is my yearning and hard work. Don't force a clumsy topic to summarize the content. It will be very unsightly and uncomfortable. Let another person speak my mind. It was unacceptable at the time.
That's all. I hope it's useful for my brother. This is one of my reading notes.