First, let's look at writing skills.
First, realize language standardization.
1, the language use standard of English papers can be used to test the English learning situation of students at all levels of education. Whether the spelling mistakes are obvious, the choice of words is appropriate, whether there are traces of Chinglish in the sentence pattern, and whether there is British thinking from the whole text.
2. Language usage norms of English papers can be used to test students' thinking logic when writing papers. Language usage norms include not only the use of words and sentences, but also sentence paragraphs and logic, as well as style and style. Different papers can show different writing ideas and argumentation methods. Some ask questions first and then draw conclusions. Some give their own arguments at the beginning of the article, and then expand their statements and arguments.
3. The language usage norms of English test papers can be used to test whether students have the requirements and standards of listening instructors in class. Some tutors give templates and corresponding requirements in class. If the use is not standardized, the instructors will be angry.
Second, language standardizes writing skills.
1, basic level. If the graduation thesis is compared to a magnificent building, words and phrases are the cornerstone and foundation. Therefore, it is strongly suggested that students should accumulate ways to learn English in their daily classes and studies, get rid of mother tongue thinking, and stop speaking Chinese as a transition when communicating with people, thinking about problems and writing papers. Usually read more English documents, remember to take notes, learn more, think more and practice more.
2. Build a structure. With the help of the opening report and outline, arrange the materials to be used, including the documents and notes compiled by yourself, in the order on the outline. Before and during writing, we should clarify our thinking, think about the structure of the argument, make the center clear and the details appropriate.
3. Form a writing style. It is quite difficult to reflect your own style and article style according to the nature and topic of the course, which can also be called the stage of revision and polishing, and strive for professionalism.
Then let's take a look at the misunderstanding of writing.
Remember not to lie!
Pay attention to the number of contexts and logics before and after. Recruiters are not fools. If your composition says that your family was poor when you were a child, but the high school on your resume is an aristocratic school, what do you think of the admissions teacher? If your writing ability is strong enough, you can write ordinary experiences vividly. Therefore, improving your writing ability is king!
Don't spend too much.
It is understandable that the composition is beautifully written, but it is not good if the words used are so uncommon that the admissions teacher has to look it up in the dictionary to know what it means. Words that are not commonly used do not necessarily appear advanced, and appropriate words are the best.
A British journalism professor has publicly stated that he hates the word "use". Why use "utilization" when "use" can be clearly expressed?
When writing an article, you must remember: "A word of five cents will do, and don't use a word of 10."
No bureaucracy.
Many foreign students and friends may have this feeling. When writing a composition, they seem to be different from themselves at ordinary times, and often unconsciously play the official language. For example, in an essay, you may write: "A harbinger of her revolutionary strategy …", but in real life, you will directly say: "The style she insists on …" Which looks more like what a 20-year-old young man would say? What the admissions teacher wants to hear is your voice and your expression, not others. I don't want you to be bureaucratic. It doesn't mean that you can use online language freely in your composition. You should also pay attention to this.
Don't prove the truth with trivial examples.
Start with small things, but don't write trivial things.
Don't list your achievements.
It is very dangerous to list your achievements in an article. The word limit of a composition is only 500+, which is not too much. If you use these precious words to write boring grades, it will undoubtedly reduce your chances of being admitted. Your GPA scores and extracurricular activities are written on your resume, so you don't need to repeat them on Essay. If a resume is a stick figure, then essays are the process of coloring. The purpose of the essay is to let the admissions teacher know more about you, but don't talk endlessly, save resources and be complete. Don't waste opportunities.
Finally, let's look at the reference model.
In English law, the legislative power belongs to Parliament. However, judges also make laws through judicial pronouncements. According to the British legal system, people think that the judgment of the high court is binding on the lower courts. This principle is famous for "following precedent", which means to stand by and watch the cases decided before. The importance of this principle lies in that the court must follow the case previously decided, especially if the decision is made by a higher court. For example, the court of appeal must follow the judgment of the British Supreme Court (the former House of Lords).
It can also be said that the current judicial precedent has been established in such a way that it will be easier for judges to interpret the law and follow the path of precedent. The precedent is now flexible enough to give judges room to make fair and just judgments according to the requirements of time.
All judgments have at least created a persuasive precedent, and the degree of persuasiveness depends on the position of the court in the legal hierarchy. For example, the precedent from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is not binding because it is not part of the normal hierarchy of courts in the United Kingdom (because it is composed of up to nine senior judges, ordinary court of appeal judges (or senior judges in the House of Lords)).
The postscript has become law in many cases, such as (London Central Property Trust Company Limited v. High Trees House Company Limited) and Pinnel case.
There are three main reasons why persuasive precedents are not binding:
First, the precedent principle in similar cases should be treated in the same way. This restriction does not apply to persuasive precedents.
Second, there are a lot of convincing precedents, and it is unrealistic to follow them.
Third, persuasive precedents are usually not regarded as reasons for judgment by courts, and even if they are, they are usually not considered. Therefore, there is a greater risk that they will be regarded as sick and therefore may be bad laws.
Only legal provisions are binding. For example, in the case (Qualcast v. Haynes), the "precedent" that ruled that the employer failed to give instructions on the use of protective clothing was a factual negligence and a factual issue, so it was not binding.
There are two main theories of precedent. The first is the declaration theory, which holds that the common law will not change-in every case, the law is just restated, not supplemented-and judges announce the law on the basis of past judgments.
The realistic theory is that they do-all principles must come from somewhere at first, and the abstraction of old principles is the creation of new principles.