First, the principle of topic selection:
The topic should be novel, and the path of topic selection: discipline, direction, field, topic, topic, problem, solution and effect evaluation.
Topic orientation: Frontier disciplines, especially interdisciplinary disciplines, have room for expansion and innovation.
Second, misunderstanding: predecessors have studied a lot of things, but not much. On the basis of predecessors, it is not allowed to climb the peak.
This requires looking at the research objectives, research problems and research framework, moistening things silently, listening to thunder in the silent place, the times are progressing, science is developing, running water is not rotten, and it is of course valuable to study things that others have not studied. At the same time, predecessors' research results can also be refined, and academic inheritance must keep pace with the times, and only innovation can develop.
Third, look for innovation from the topic:
Facing the new language phenomenon (language research in the network age and self-media age), facing the old language phenomenon (development and inheritance of the old language, cross development and evolution, etc.). ), facing the specific language theory (supplement, revision and perfection) and facing the interdisciplinary (social psychology and pragmatics: code-switching, symbol substitution, etc. )
Theoretical research: seeking * * * (linguistics * * *, pragmatics * * *, cognition * * *, etc. Applied research: seeking countermeasures (oriented to planning policy and practice (teaching, colloquial application, translation, correction, etc.). ).)。
Fourth, these themes are not innovative:
The topics are too big and wide, such as cognitive study of grammar, right and wrong analysis of Chinese-English system, and preliminary study of cognitive grammar.
Too microscopic has no universal theoretical value. The topic is too big to repeat other people's research. The conclusion points to common sense and vagueness that can be easily attributed.