First, the argument should be correct and reasonable. Vivid.
For example, the teacher asked the students to write an argumentative essay according to the following paragraph. The main idea of this material is: one day, two people went to buy a shield. A man stood on the left of the shield seller and said, "This shield is a golden shield." A man stood on the right side of the shield seller and said, "This shield is a silver shield." The two men turned red in the face. Then the shield seller said, "You are both wrong. This shield is neither gold nor silver. On one side is a gold and silver shield. "
Second, analysis and reasoning should conform to the correct principles.
When writing an argumentative essay, analysis and reasoning can't be irrelevant and subjective. You can't think that everything you say is reasonable. There are ~ objective criteria for the correctness of analytical reasoning. We should look at this problem from a correct standpoint.
Third, we should be good at talking about "small things", but don't use narration instead of discussion.
There are many "little things" in our daily life; ; For example, "giving up your seat" to other passengers on the bus, not spitting, not swearing, these seem to be "trivial things", but you should learn to "exploit loopholes" when writing a composition. Make a mountain out of a molehill How to deal with the relationship between "narration" and "discussion" in argumentative essays, such as "carrying forward the spirit of getting what you pay for" and "swearing is uncivilized", are all inspirations for students to write such compositions. You can't just say that things are not discussed, and you can't just describe the detailed process of the case without analysis. For example, it is unnecessary to spend most of the time telling stories about Yang Le and Zhang Guanghou's study from primary school to university. It is not good to "discuss this matter by yourself" or "discuss it with Syria".
Be clear about what you want to "describe". It may be used as an "introduction" to lead to an argument, or it may be used as a factual argument to prove an argument. The purpose of "narration" is to better "discuss".
"Narration" should focus on the central idea, which should not only be summarized, but also have some specific contents. Don't elaborate on what those people know. And those things that can be used as arguments to prove the argument should be written clearly as the key points, so as to explain and explain the truth.
Fourth, we must also serve others.
Argumentative writing must convince people with reasoning. Well-founded, not only to say "so", but also to say "why". Therefore, to "convince people by reasoning", we should:
"fewer but better", not "more and more". The facts you put forward and the truth you speak should be to the point. Cannot be used
Because the more you talk, the fuller you will be. You can't "win by more". You should prevent the phenomenon of piling up words and lists.
Be targeted. This is discussed closely around the central argument. Speaking positive arguments, you can't "rock the boat and hit Heng Pao"; To refute a wrong argument, criticize its fallacy and don't say anything irrelevant to it. "irrelevant" and "you say yours, I say mine" can't contradict each other.
Say "why" clearly and don't label it casually. Especially when pointing out the seriousness and harmfulness of the problem, we should pay more attention to this point. For example, when writing the composition "Spitting is unacceptable", some students said, "Is spitting right? Of course not! Spitting everywhere is very uncivilized. If it develops, it will degenerate into a criminal. " That's too much.
That's enough about using ideas to control materials when writing arguments.
The second question to pay attention to is: hierarchy. Clear organization. First of all, we should discuss it layer by layer around the center.
The most important thing is to "focus on purity"; ; It is necessary to find out which should be said first, which should be said later, which is primary, which is secondary, which should be said more, which should be said in detail, which should be said less and which should be said briefly. The key here is to focus on the center. The commonly used method is: after the argument is completed, the conclusion is drawn after analysis and discussion. Among them, the analysis and discussion part, whether to put the facts first or later, whether to reason first or later, depends on the specific situation and the author's own writing habits.
Second, we should arrange the content according to the law of argumentative writing itself.
An argumentative essay generally consists of three parts, namely: "Ask questions. Analyze problems and solve problems. "
The beginning part is generally used to ask questions and complete the task of "putting forward arguments" This part should make it clear what this composition is about.
The middle part, which generally occupies a long space and is divided into several paragraphs, is the "center of gravity" of this composition. This part should be used to "analyze the problem". The task of presenting sufficient arguments (or putting facts or reasoning) to demonstrate arguments is mainly completed in this part. This part should make it clear why this composition says so.
The ending part (or "ending part") is mainly used to complete the task of "solving problems". Specific ways are: draw a conclusion; Point out the solution to the problem; Or both. This part is to make it clear that this composition should tell people how to do it.
It can be said that the arrangement of an argumentative paper is: "ask questions-analyze problems-solve problems", or "argument-argument-conclusion" and "what-why-how to do it".
The third problem to pay attention to is that the language of argumentative writing should be accurate, concise and concrete.
Strictly distinguish the meaning of words, and the words must be unambiguous, ambiguous and ambiguous.
Concise, smooth and appropriate.
We should pay attention to the choice of words and sentences, and make the abstract truth concrete, vivid, vivid and interesting.
Flexible and changeable sentence patterns can be adopted. Use long sentences, carefully, without loopholes; Use short sentences concisely The affirmative sentence can be changed to double negation; When dealing with the Chen Qi question, rhetorical questions and rhetorical questions are used. This can enhance the emotional color of the article;
In addition, argumentative essays can also use some narratives and explanations appropriately. Lyric and descriptive techniques.