Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Normative points of references attached to papers and monographs
Normative points of references attached to papers and monographs
The normative points of references attached to papers and monographs are as follows:

References attached to papers and monographs are oral records of documents that were really cited when writing works, including those cited and those not cited in the notes. The main points of its specification are as follows: the paper should include the author's name, title, periodical name, publication year, issue and starting and ending page numbers; The monograph shall include the author's name, title, place of publication, publishing house, year of publication and edition number; Network literature should include the author's name, literature name, website, online publishing time and access time.

In principle, the format of the arrangement is in accordance with the Rules for the Description of References after Articles formulated by the National Bureau of Standards, and the humanities can proceed from the characteristics of Chinese.

According to the nature of the paper, choose two arrangements:

1, put the same author together, and then arrange them according to the publication year of the works; Different authors are arranged by surname pinyin or Chinese character strokes.

2. Classify and arrange in chronological order. It should be noted that chronological arrangement is helpful to see the chronological order of literature, so as to sort out the origin and inheritance of works and highlight the earliest creators. This is more suitable for modern published papers and books. For ancient books, we must consider the dynasty when the works were produced, not the year when they were compiled and published today. If social science needs to talk to the international community, it can be arranged according to international practice. Journals can be submitted according to the requirements of editors.

References should be widely collected, but they don't necessarily include all works, but they can include documents that are really valuable and have been referenced to varying degrees. Generally speaking, works that do not conform to academic norms or are recognized as of low quality should not be cited unless for the purpose of criticism, but representative works of important schools and famous works with far-reaching influence cannot be omitted.

There are also some people who have a bad style of study and clearly adopt other people's views or materials. In order to cover up the facts, they are full of initiative and deliberately delete documents that should be listed as the most reference materials. As the corresponding files directly or indirectly quoted, they are deliberately avoided, not marked or annotated, and only listed in the attached file directory, which is a deliberate omission.