As for "the content of Ding Xuan's lectures released by some netizens is taken out of context", it is not a powerful excuse. About Ding Xuan, there are many lectures that can be inquired publicly on the Internet, including women's virtue is the key to maintaining family order, how women maintain their husbands' order, women's etiquette and self-cultivation and so on. The target audience of these lectures are all aimed at women, and the contents are basically contrary to women's independence and liberation.
Feminists must not like Ding Xuan. For many years, she has been calling for women's liberation, but she has not been welcomed by mainstream public opinion. Instead, he has entered the campus in an imposing manner and is obedient to the four virtues. In a trance, people have the illusion of being in the old society.
In fact, disgust is not unique to feminists, and the public opinion around Ding Xuan is in a state of overall dumping. This shows that at the level of public discourse, the theory of "three obedience and four virtues" has been swept into the pile of old papers, at least, it has lost its "legitimacy" that has been publicly stated.
But reality is more subtle than public opinion. Although Ding Xuan was criticized this time, she has always been a pleasant guest. According to the notice issued by Jiujiang University, Ding Xuan is not only a lecturer in traditional culture of the Women's Federation Foundation, but also the executive vice president of Hebei Traditional Culture Research Association. In recent years, she has been invited to trade unions, women's federations, universities, enterprises and non-governmental organizations to give lectures for hundreds of times. It must be admitted that Dingxuan is the product of the market, and female morality is still the underground school of this era.
It is not difficult to refute Ding Xuan. Modern society emphasizes rights and freedoms, and discusses dependence from three aspects and four virtues. If you don't marry from your father, marry from your husband. This is why there is such a rhetoric as "Wang Fuqi Jia". Ding Xuan also said that women should dress appropriately and not be too exposed. A sentence "I can't be bothered by anything" can be sneered at. In the theoretical struggle, Ding Xuan, the guardian of traditional women's morality culture, does not have much room. Ding Xuan's weapon lies in the patriarchal clan system remnants of reality and modern society.
A new generation of young people will probably find it incredible to hear that "the husband is dead and the son is obedient." However, if it is a social division of labor of "men dominate outside and women dominate inside", the number of people who agree will increase; If it is extended to married men to buy a house and marry a good husband, more people will take it for granted. This is the dividing line between theory and reality. At first glance, women seem to get rid of the solidification and instrumentalization of traditional culture, unload the shackles and start the road of financial freedom. However, there is still a long way to go in Xiu Yuan, and male chauvinism still suppresses women's liberation. In the economic structure and social division of labor, women, as a whole right, have not established their independence.
The viewer thinks Ding Xuan is ridiculous, but in essence she just follows the clues left by the patriarchal society and goes back to history to find the theoretical basis of history to match it, thus forming a completely opposite direction to feminists. The discomfort of the outside world is not so much the absurdity of Ding Xuan's female moral education as that we are unwilling to admit Ding Xuan's existence, because her existence means a huge gap between the theoretical consensus of women's liberation and social practice. Feminists have been trying to bridge this gap, but people seem to be tired of it. The other side of boredom is to enjoy the dividend of this gap, including women themselves.
The greater irony is that Ding Xuan moved the education of women's morality into the university classroom, but the dross of traditional culture entered a field that should be able to identify the dross most. It would be interesting to contact the University Self-discipline Committee to contain couples before, and the university set up an exposure wall to expose the news of intimate relationship between couples. The revival of women's virtue has given a loud slap in the face to the liberation of rights. So, who is the evocator? The answer is certainly not just Ding Xuan.