Everyone in the workplace has experienced interviews, big and small, and the process of wits and games with the interviewer can be described as sour and refreshing. Sometimes I feel good about myself, but in the end I can't escape the fate of being brushed. I don't know what the problem is after thinking about it.
In fact, in order to stand out successfully in the interview, in addition to excellent ability, you need to find out some careful thoughts of the interviewer.
-What kind of candidates do they like? -Which candidates do they like least? -How can I skillfully respond to the interviewer's questions?
Especially for new and new people who have just entered the workplace, how can they be more calm in front of countless HR readers and get their favorite offer smoothly?
-
The interview is really an interesting scene.
The applicant Pharaoh sells melons for fear that the interviewer will not know how good he is;
The interviewer found fault with the egg for fear of not seeing the applicant's minor faults.
Everyone said their own things and talked well, but there was no news of the final result. I really don't understand why the interviewer "says one thing and does another" I really can't understand or understand their "words and deeds".
It's really naive to give up like this. For young people who are new to the workplace, it is normal to be "routine" when entering the "pit".
In the face of experienced HR people, do you really understand their meticulous thoughts?
1. What kind of people are the interviewers most annoyed with?
What the interviewer fears most is not the candidates with low ability. Generally, you can get a general understanding by reading your resume. In addition, the organization will also recruit some people with average ability, otherwise it will recruit a group of professionals. Who will do the work? Therefore, the interviewer is the most annoying. ......
-obviously low ability and lack of objective self-cognition; -candidates who know their own weight and brag about their abilities. -It's a very life-consuming thing, isn't it? !
On the one hand, if what he says is realistic, you have to consume a lot of brain cells to see that he is pretending to be X.
You know, the interview is actually a very energy-consuming thing. The interviewer should talk to you smoothly → extract key clues from your answers and identify logical conflicts, so as to identify whether you are lying at the first time → At the same time, think about the next question to avoid the cold interview ... reasonable, which is not simple at all. On the other hand, even if HR recognizes that the other person is lying in the first sentence, it can't drive people away, can it? Everyone who invites himself will cry. You should pretend to be calm, pretend to know nothing, and accompany you through this journey. Finally, I have to ask politely:
-Do you have anything else to ask me? -If you pass the interview, we will inform you of the second interview within one week.
For example, last time a children's shoe came to interview our UI designer, and graduated from China Geo University (the full-time column on the interview registration form: Yes! ! ! )。 I glanced at the interview application form and quickly determined that this person was cheating me with a fake degree. The calligraphy level of the second grade in this primary school doesn't match the language expression ability of the later language, thinking that I don't know how difficult it is to get into Beijing from this big province of college entrance examination?
The topic of the college paper was asked several times, and I forgot to answer it after one answer. I forgot the title of my thesis two years after graduation, but I said I didn't remember if I didn't think about it. Are you sure children's shoes are not for fun? The interviewer's brain should run at a high speed and always be authoritative and professional; While smiling, I still have to look at your outfit quietly, and the tricks make you full of loopholes. After tossing for so long, my brain is tired and my heart is even more tired. It's just a waste of time chatting with you. After all, HR still needs an interview. However, such behavior is actually insulting an HR's IQ and professionalism.
As I said above, children's shoes are probably forced to be full-time by part-time undergraduates. Most experienced hiring managers can see this at a glance. Actually, I didn't speak that day either. I thought he was suspicious at first sight. No matter in which industry, enterprise or post, integrity will always be at the forefront.
As a job seeker, you may not know that once you are questioned by the interviewer, even if you are qualified for the job, you will not be hired, because he doesn't know what else you are hiding and covering up. So, stop thinking about how to cheat the interviewer, be simple and speak in a simple way. Interview is not a transaction, after all, business can't be right.
2. What kind of person does the interviewer like?
If I boast that you will question it, well, what about me laughing at myself? Do interviewers also habitually question? This is a very interesting phenomenon. When people think that others can benefit from the ideas they advocate, they will doubt the credibility of this person. At this time, even if his point of view is objective, people will not believe it. Just like "Lao Wang sells melons to brag", must her melons be neither sweet nor sandy? No, no, no, Walster's research (1966) found that if the opinions supported by the subjects are unfavorable to them, the persuasion effect is the best.
At the same time, in the experiment of persuading criminals and local prosecutors to "increase or decrease the power of law enforcement personnel", when prosecutors demand to increase the power of law enforcement personnel, the persuasiveness is obviously reduced;
When a criminal demands to increase the power of law enforcement officers, his influence is far greater than his persuasiveness when he demands to reduce the power of law enforcement officers.
In other words, when you try to convince someone, it will be better if you can say something that is contrary to your own interests.
Especially in the face of many interviewers, if you can master this flexibly, it will have unexpected results. Because most professional interviewers brush many candidates face to face, they are immune to the expressions and performances of all kinds of candidates after thousands of people's baptism. It is absolutely difficult to get them to change their evaluation of the candidates. When the interviewer thinks that he is more professional and has an average judgment on the candidate, if you are still delusional, it will be counterproductive to try to convince him through high-intensity speech skills. For example, candidates force themselves to express how good they are. If you miss me, you will miss the whole world. Well, congratulations, you have been blacklisted by the interviewer successfully. Take your time:)
So ... why don't you try to be stupid? Yes, you are not mistaken, you are playing dumb! The trick of playing dumb is to gain the trust of the interviewer by saying that you are "stupid", so as to lower his defensive psychology and let him recognize "your positive evaluation of yourself". Of course, the first point is to "create opportunities to shift from all kinds of interview questions to saying that you are stupid." For example, you will always face such a problem:
Evaluate yourself in three words? ? Why can I get a scholarship/honor as an excellent employee? Why is it developing so fast? ? Why do you say you can blend in with your colleagues? ? I see that your resume says * * *. How did you do this job well? ? Can you share your greatest gains in these years?
At this time, you can answer accordingly:
I think "learning ability", "innovation ability" and "stupidity" can best represent me? Maybe it's because I'm stupid Because I'm more real, and sometimes I'm a little stupid, right? I think it's better to be practical or even stupid to do this job. Whether doing things or being a person, it will be better to be stupid.
And the interviewer will definitely wonder, "Why do you say that?" ? You can choose from the following reference answers: ① the question about "why do you get good grades and do a good job"
This fool needs to reflect.
Give a chestnut:
When I first arrived at this position, I was still a novice, and the leader was also a sheep manager. I know nothing about my job. At that time, I thought, sort out my work and see what tasks I often face. So I spent a week or so sorting out the * categories * subcategories of the resignation interview form (or so-and-so file) in the past year, and classified and coded them according to different situations. After I counted these recent documents one by one, the table I compiled can grade and evaluate the resignations of different people and those of a certain period. If someone asks to leave again and enters the job number information, they will know the urgency of the situation and how to deal with it ..... So, when I became a formal probationary employee at the end of the year, I also got the outstanding employee of the department. I think it doesn't matter whether you are stupid or not, as long as you do the basic work solidly, in fact, the work is traceable.
② About "Why do you get everyone's approval and become one with your classmates and colleagues?"
This fool needs to reflect.
Give a chestnut:
Actually, I'm not the kind of person who knows myself very well, but I think I'm sincere. I am willing to help others. Whenever I see other people's difficulties, I feel sad if I don't ask. Moreover, if there is any good news or information, I am willing to share it with others as soon as possible. Over time, I feel that everyone is also very kind to me. Of course, if you say you have been hurt, there must be. But most people around me are very kind and considerate. I think as long as you think more about others, you will gain many friends. As for why I became a monitor, in fact, no one in the university wants to be a monitor. Everyone has his own personality, so it is particularly difficult to organize an activity. He often makes a sandwich bread between schools, teachers and classmates. However, someone has to do this job, and everyone gave it to me, which is a trust in me. I can't disappoint you. So there's nothing wrong with paying more. Of course, some people will call me stupid, and I think it's worth it.
(3) The question about "Why did you do what others couldn't?"
This fool needs to reflect.
Give a chestnut:
Now people are impetuous, always pay, and see the return and results immediately. Moreover, I feel that the return cycle of many things in the world is not so fast, so I will be willing to take root in my chosen field and make myself a qualified person according to my own plan. I always do this at school. For example, my CET-6 score is excellent, but in fact, I don't spend much time on English. I just study hard from freshman to senior. I think this language is very important to me, so I never give up. In this way, I persisted and got 7 points in IELTS. People ask me what you know, but I really don't understand, just 30 minutes a day. When I was a freshman, my English teacher said that "persistence is the most important thing in learning a language". Actually, I didn't create some kind of learning method. Maybe I am more obedient and stupid. So I think sometimes ability is not the most critical. You have to be silly and willing to work hard to make up for the shortcomings in your ability.
I believe that if you answer questions seriously with the above ideas, you should leave a good impression on HR, but in order to let you pass the interviewer's screening smoothly, I hope you can find a real example from your own life and make yourself a truly responsible person.
3. Is "playing dumb" really just a "black skill"?
If you think "playing dumb" is a "black skill", it's a bit shallow. In fact, the stupidity we mentioned above is obviously not really stupid, but a manifestation of personality. This dimension of personality can be generally understood as responsibility, and can also be translated as conscientious, rigorous, earnest, controlled and fair. As a dimension of "Big Five Personality", it reflects the degree of individual diligence, prudence, perseverance, self-discipline and order. Sense of responsibility is the most stable and effective performance prediction index among the five personalities.
This may be a trait-oriented motivational variable that many industrial and organizational psychologists have been looking for for for a long time. The predictive ability of the other four factors is limited to specific occupational categories or performance indicators. Responsibility is positively related to the performance of most professional fields, but there are some exceptions, such as artists who need highly creative work. A high sense of responsibility in these areas is negatively correlated with performance. So playing dumb is a very scientific way to package yourself, which can help you stand out in the interview.
But ... HR people are also critical. If you are really empty-handed, it will be difficult to muddle through.