According to the prosecution's accusation, Fang Hua, the legal representative of Jiangxi Wantong Group, borrowed the qualifications of Zhejiang Dengfeng Transportation Group Co., Ltd. and other three companies to participate in the bidding of Jilin Expressway project in the second half of 20 10. Xu Runlong knew that Fang Hua's practice did not meet the requirements, but he still greeted Fang Hua at his request to help him pass the prequalification and win the bid. In the process of construction, Fang Hua's engineering quality has serious defects. When the Project Office and the experts' demonstration meeting reported to Xu Runlong the disposal opinions of overall rework twice, Xu Runlong asked the Project Office and experts to consider carefully on the grounds of tight construction period and heavy tasks, and finally decided on the scheme of combining local rework and reinforcement. After the opening of the BP 1 bid section of Jilian Expressway, it was identified by the authoritative department that the subbase and middle subbase of the BP 1 bid section had some defects, such as large thickness dispersion, loose structure and poor compactness, which had a negative impact on the service performance and service life of the road and would increase the maintenance cost of the road. The cost of rework exceeds 24.6 million yuan.
It is alleged that Xu Runlong took advantage of his position as deputy director of Jiangxi Provincial Communications Department to seek benefits for others in highway construction, project bidding and other work, and successively accepted the property of Fang Hua and others 17, totaling RMB1797.13,620,700 yuan and US$ 3,000.
Due to the seriousness of the case, the case will be pronounced on another day.