This report sparked a heated discussion on the Internet. Some netizens think that this kind of behavior is very likely to change British history, but some netizens think that this is more a family matter and has little impact on the country.
I think this kind of behavior may change British history, because it is related to the candidate who may act as king in the future. For Britain at this stage, the importance of the existence of the king is beyond doubt. Although it seems that the symbolic meaning is greater than the actual meaning, in case of special circumstances, the royal family may become a new leader in the future. For the list of members of the royal family who can act as agents of the king in Britain, everyone on the list is extremely important to the royal family and Britain.
According to the current British law, this role is mainly played by the monarch's spouse and four 2 1 year-old royal family members in the order of succession to the throne. However, what Charles III did this time, on the one hand, changed this precedent, which will have a great impact on the future royal list, on the other hand, it is very likely to affect the candidate for the position of king in a special period.
Originally, Charles III's sister and Baodai were not on this list, which meant that they had no right to represent the king. But once they are added to this list, it means that they can represent the royal plants in a special period, which is likely to affect the formulation of corresponding policies in Britain and thus the history of Britain.
The inheritance of the British royal family and the change of the list of generations of kings seem to have little influence, but no one knows what will happen in the future. If one day the royal family still controls the leadership, then this list may change not only the history of Britain, but even the history of the world.