Many times, when people go out to eat, when choosing a restaurant, they will find that the store says "No bringing drinks". This sign annoys many people and opens it directly with the staff because they bought drinks from outside. However, some people who bought drinks from outside changed to a store where they could bring their own drinks, or returned the drinks they bought. In fact, opening a restaurant is to hope that customers will consume the drinks in the store. Compared with dishes with low gross profit, bringing your own drinks means losing the wine income with high gross profit. Let consumers drink their own drinks, and operators drink northwest wind?

What's more, the operator has fulfilled the obligation to inform in advance, and it should be an offer to wait for a response, which does not violate the mandatory provisions of the contract law on format clauses. As for some restaurants with relatively simple facilities, customers are allowed to bring their own drinks, and the operators also consider it from the perspective of small profits but quick turnover, which is another matter.

Drinking in the rain outside is not the same as drinking in a restaurant, is it? Is drinking in a nightclub the same as drinking outside? If you can bring drinks, can you bring meals? If you bring drinks and meals into the store, who will be responsible for diarrhea?

In addition, drinking in the hotel enjoys the hotel environment, atmosphere and service. In terms of cost, plus environmental use fees and service fees, these costs are all in dishes and drinks. Allowing restaurants to bring their own drinks is a discount promotion for the environment and services, but the cost is added to the dishes. To say the least, should the hotel be responsible for any problems with the wine brought outside?

People who hold the opposite view believe that wine is evaluated as a catalyst for emotions. Why do some people prefer to "bring their own wine to drink" when going out to parties, rather than drinking hotel wine? The reason is realistic! First of all, the price of wine in restaurants is very expensive, and the main source of profit of many hotels is actually not the profit of dishes, but drinks.

Secondly, the wine in the hotel is difficult to distinguish between true and false, and the quality level is uneven. Through which dealers, the purchase channels are not transparent enough, and diners are not clear. In addition, many people think that the reason for the increase in the behavior of bringing drinks in restaurants is the overlord clause that the relevant state departments explicitly prohibit catering institutions from "not bringing drinks".

Finally, in general, people who really like drinking have their own fixed favorite brands. Other wines are not used to drinking, so bring them from home.

Personally, I don't think it's the overlord clause. On the contrary, it should be declined. Look carefully, this is discussing the "overlord clause". Restaurants need to express rejection, not hide it. The restaurant refused to bring its own drinks, so consumers could not enter the store for consumption. After the store clearly stated that it is necessary to bring wine into consumption, it is overlord!