The manuscript design of this PPT is relatively simple, and some logical relationships are difficult to understand. The overall color matching and typesetting are a bit cheap. Then we will analyze them one by one.

Let's look at the first PPT first.

case analysis

1. Although the focus of the page is very prominent, it is slightly monotonous and the visual effect is relatively dull.

My thoughts on review.

The manuscript is relatively simple, with black characters on a white background, no sense of design, and relatively monotonous. I designed it according to the original size of 4:3. Although it is not as magnificent as 16:9, there is still a delicate feeling between the lines and the background. The following is my finished product for your reference.

Next, look at the second PPT.

case analysis

1. The page content is too full and the color scheme is too bright to read.

2. Some of the black outlines in the red blocks are not properly matched and the pages are not harmonious.

My thoughts on review.

Using the ring, the product service community can be skillfully divided into three sections, which can make the content more differentiated. The following is my finished product for your reference.

How to make a doughnut chart: Insert a pie chart and select a doughnut chart. Our goal is to divide doughnuts into six parts, that is, 360 degrees divided by 6=60 degrees. We just need to divide the doughnut data into six copies, each with 60 data, and then copy three doughnuts and place them in layers. As shown below.

Next, look at the third PPT.

case analysis

1. In the platform part, the left and right spacing of the text content in the right color block is uneven and irregular.

2. There is no need to underline the bottom of the text content, which is redundant.

My thoughts on review.

This page is divided into two pages, and the expression will be clearer. Expressed by graphics, the open shapes on the left and right sides symbolize the tolerance and love of the platform.

Next, look at the fourth PPT.

case analysis

1. The page space utilization rate is not enough, resulting in the content being bound in the middle part, which is somewhat compact.

2. There is no correspondence between the colors of the page, and the correlation between the left and right content is even smaller.

My thoughts on review.

It is more interesting and attractive to use an animation city to express boring concepts.

Next look at the fifth PPT.

case analysis

1. The details are not handled well, and the page looks rough. For example, the boxes of eight major systems are not aligned with the contents on the right;

2. The text content of the claim part is close to the edge of the ellipse, which is somewhat crowded;

My thoughts on review.

The content is mainly upgraded, so it is highlighted from small to large.

Finally, let's take a look at the comparison before and after plastic surgery.

original manuscript

My revised draft

see you again