According to the accusation of prosecution by the procuratorate, the court found through trial that from May 1995 to August 1999,/kloc-0 received and demanded 65,440 copies from Zhou, President of Jiangxi Aote Car Rental Co., Ltd. and Chairman of Jiangxi Jinyang Guang Enterprise Group Co., Ltd. (handled separately). Among them, RMB 2.8 million, USD 80,000, HK$ 940,000 and valuables worth more than RMB 970,000.

Hu Changqing also took advantage of his position to seek benefits for bribers many times, resulting in huge property losses of the country.

The court held that the defendant Hu Changqing, as a national staff member and a senior government leading cadre, accepted and demanded huge bribes and used his position to seek benefits for others, which constituted the crime of accepting bribes, and the amount was extremely huge, resulting in heavy losses to state property, extremely bad social impact and particularly serious circumstances, and should be severely punished according to law.

The court also held that Hu Changqing paid bribes to state functionaries in order to seek illegitimate interests, and failed to explain the legal source of huge amounts of property, which respectively constituted the crime of accepting bribes and the crime of unclear source of huge amounts of property.

The Supreme People's Court confirmed that Hu Changqing, as the vice governor of Jiangxi Province, has successively held the leadership positions of relevant state departments. He should be an exemplary law-abiding, but he used his power to seek benefits for bribers and trade power and money, which caused extremely bad social impact. The amount of bribery is extremely large, which has caused great losses to state property and the circumstances of the crime are particularly serious. Should be severely punished in accordance with the relevant provisions of the criminal law.

On March 7, 2000, the Supreme People's Court approved Hu Changqing's death penalty, and at the same time issued an order to execute Hu Changqing. On March 8, 2000, Hu Changqing was executed in Nanchang.

Hu Changqing:

/kloc-0 was born in Changde, Hunan province in August, 1948./kloc-0 joined the army in March, 1968./kloc-0 joined the party in June, 1969, and changed jobs in June, 438+0979. From 65438 to 0987, he worked in China People's Insurance Company, People's Republic of China (PRC) State Taxation Bureau and State Bureau of Religious Affairs. 1In August, 1995, he was transferred from the deputy director of the State Bureau of Religious Affairs to the assistant governor of Jiangxi Province.1In February, 1998, he was elected as the deputy governor of Jiangxi Province and the deputy to the Ninth National People's Congress. 1At the end of 999, Hu Changqing was placed on file for investigation by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection for serious violation of discipline and law. On March 8, 2000, Hu Changqing was executed in Nanchang. He is the first senior official at the provincial and ministerial level to be sentenced to death for economic crimes since the reform and opening up.

Life experience:

1948 was born in Changde city, Hunan province in August, and once bought a fake LLB certificate of Peking University from Hu Changqing;

Joined the army in March 1968, joined the party in June 1969, and changed jobs in June1979;

65438 transferred to Beijing 0987, and worked in China Insurance Company, People's Republic of China (PRC) State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China and State Bureau of Religious Affairs successively;

1August, 1995, transferred to Jiangxi as assistant governor;

1998 1 was elected as the deputy governor of Jiangxi Province and the representative of the Ninth People's Congress of Jiangxi Province;

On March 8, 2000, Hu Changqing was executed in Nanchang.

Case introduction:

The court held that the defendant Hu Changqing, as a national staff member and a senior government leading cadre, accepted and demanded huge bribes and used his position to seek benefits for others, which constituted the crime of accepting bribes, and the amount was extremely huge, resulting in heavy losses to state property, extremely bad social impact and particularly serious circumstances, and should be severely punished according to law. The court also held that Hu Changqing paid bribes to state functionaries in order to seek illegitimate interests, and failed to explain the legal source of huge amounts of property, which respectively constituted the crime of accepting bribes and the crime of unclear source of huge amounts of property.