For beginners or laymen, what you see is what you get has a code function (what you see is what you get) (note: computer-generated code is always daunting, so please don't use this function if you want to show the code in the future).
In addition, CSS can also be edited through GUI (very troublesome). For programmers, it is an IDE with high code brightness and code prompt/completion function. Preview mode allows you to see the effect in real time when writing code, and also integrates FTP synchronization function. In short, for Dw ten or even five years ago, it grew up with the pioneers of HTML/CSS web design, and it was not an art notebook.
But today, I don't think Dw has any obvious advantages. Several colleagues used to use DW because they were used to it. This is a problem of imperfect tools. When submitting code, there must be standards, and individuals are free to use any tools. (Actually, after contacting Dreamweaver, I am not interested in learning the front end. The first editor that caught my interest was Edit++, and later it was changed to mac. This is a brand-new world) As for some friends who like to write DW on their resumes (including DW that the recruitment position needs to be familiar with), to be honest, I think it is worth making a fuss.
Because experienced engineers don't take this matter seriously, writing this can't help but make people feel a little unfamiliar, as if living in the past. Of course, everyone knows the mentality of writing a resume, especially when you have no experience, and you always feel that writing more is one. Dw and Ps are adobe, which makes unfamiliar people feel that their grades are similar. Anyway, people who read resumes will not take it seriously.
While communicating with Dw, if you want to keep pace with the times, it may be better to be familiar with linux, git, svn and edit++(SublimeText).