Here I will talk about par face classics.
Actually, LZ, I haven't figured out why par said I couldn't convince her. After the par meeting, she shook my hand. I was really helpless at that time, only saying that she would reconsider me. She answered me, well, I'll think about it. I don't know if it's out of courtesy or if it's really considered. After all, they have limited time and busy work.
From the BBS, I saw the face classics sent by my predecessors. Most of them say that par is very good and won't ask sharp questions.
But on Tuesday, I met the opposite situation.
First, I ordered. The secretary led me into a small room, 10 more minutes, and the students in front finished. Because this classmate is not wearing an ordinary suit, but a very elegant white plaid dress, I'm not sure whether she will come to par. When she came into my room to get her coat, I asked her and she said yes. Then she looked at her watch and told me that she had seen her for more than 40 minutes. She told me that par is in Chinese. I found that both her faces were red, and I didn't notice why at that time. Maybe this is just routine nervousness. I hope this classmate can leave me a message after seeing my face, hehe.
Then, I waited in the waiting room for about 10 minutes, and the secretary led me in. When I saw it was a female handkerchief, my head went blank. It's hard to convince a strong woman. . Plus LZ, I am really not good at using "saying" to prove that I am suitable for PricewaterhouseCoopers to have an audit. I don't believe what I say, either to myself or to others. I value action, really. . . .
Ok, the interview is officially started. Female par asked me to introduce myself. I don't think I will repeat what is on my resume. Let me say something that is not on the application form. I told par, and she said, "I didn't read your application because I didn't want to be preconceived." Okay, so how do I start? I talked about undergraduate and graduate education, internship and self-evaluation. I said my understanding of the qualities that a qualified auditor should have, and told par that although I am not a related major and have no professionalism, I am studious, have a strong learning ability, have a sense of responsibility, and am a reliable employee (LZ brought examples when talking about this, not bragging. . )。 So, I came to PwC to apply for an auditor. I forgot to say why PricewaterhouseCoopers. . Ms has. . . )
I think I have told par my past very frankly. I'm almost finished. Par said I was dishonest. I'm weak, really. She said that my major and internship have nothing to do with the one I want to apply for today. I want to put those things together with today to prove that I am very suitable for this and PricewaterhouseCoopers. What did I say? I don't want to refute, because I think it is even more impossible for me to refute. I was weak then. But there is no dishonesty in my heart. I'm just talking about my past and my plasticity. Besides my major, I also have the qualities to be a qualified auditor. That's what I'm talking about.
At that time, par told me that if I hadn't been dishonest and secretive, I would have made an offer. What should I do? . . I will admit that my internship and study really have nothing to do with auditing.
She went on to say that I chose audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers because my company is good and the platform is good. She said that I know your difficulties now, and she said that as long as I say so. . . Don't say a lot to prove yourself suitable as an auditor. . . . I can understand par, but am I self-defeating? Am I saying this to cover it up? I didn't. . . . .
Next, par asked me in English if I had a role model and an ideal lifestyle. . . I didn't expect par to ask this question. . In addition, I felt that I had no chance with PricewaterhouseCoopers at that time, so she was unlikely to give me an offer because her decision was dishonest. . . I could have spoken English well, but I didn't have any ideas. . . My words are even more illogical. . . I stuttered. . . As a result, she switched to Chinese. . . I said in English, "I'd better speak English." I know I didn't behave well before. If I want to express it in English, maybe I can make it up. " However, she said, it is not necessary. What PricewaterhouseCoopers values is not how powerful English is, but a person's logical thinking ability. . . . . I really didn't have logic at that time. . . . . (LZ is getting more and more sad here. . . )
I said I liked Jobs, but the words were fragmented, and the more I said them, the less confident I became. Par is really a great person. LZ later recalled that the younger generation was advised not to be intimidated by tricky questions, par's harsh attitude and direct criticism on the spot, but to stand firm. Because par may think that this is not suitable for you and that is not suitable in the process of criticizing you. See you still firmly choose PricewaterhouseCoopers, and firmly choose your choice. LZ was fooled and shaken by the problem of par.
At the end of the 45-minute interview, she asked me, do you think your choice is what you want? Do you really want to do an audit? . . . .
LZ is a big fool and has done a big stupid thing. I was silent. . . . . .
Most people can't do par, and women who can do par are even more powerful. Care for the younger generation. . . . Pwc is the first terminal face of LZ, and it is also the only terminal face of such a tough boss that I have ever seen, and I have no experience. But after this experience, LZ has mastered more interviewers' thoughts and will be more determined.
Encourage each other! ! ! !
;