The discipline inspection and supervision organs welcome the broad masses of people to report and accuse party member cadres of violating discipline and law through letters, visits, the website of the Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the telephone number 12388, and support and participate in anti-corruption work. Advocate real-name reporting, and all real-name reporting will be given priority and answered in time.
Discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels have continuously strengthened channels such as letters, visits, telephone calls and online reports. The Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has established the websites of official website of the Ministry of Supervision, official website of the National Bureau of Corruption Prevention and reporting letters and visits, and set up the 12388 reporting telephone number at the central, provincial, municipal and county levels to receive reports from the masses. Pay attention to finding case clues from letters and visits, patrol supervision, ongoing cases, law enforcement supervision, supervision and inspection, special governance, public security law and cases transferred by audit institutions, as well as media and online public opinion. Among the cases filed in 20 12, 4 1.8% of the clues came from letters and visits, and 20.9% came from the public security inspection law and the transfer of audit institutions. Pay attention to the relevant clues found in handling cases, and investigate and deal with a number of "wo cases" and "serial cases". The clues of cases come from the clues found in handling cases, accounting for 7. 1%.
Discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels also pay close attention to the violations of laws and regulations of party member cadres exposed by the news media and the Internet, and have successively investigated and dealt with a number of cases of violations of laws and regulations. For example, the relevant discipline inspection and supervision organs have seriously investigated and dealt with cases such as Yang Dacai, former director of Shaanxi Provincial Administration of Work Safety, and Cai Bin, former political commissar of Panyu Branch of Guangzhou Urban Management Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau, and responded to social concerns.
Tieling City Commission for Discipline Inspection and Municipal Supervision Bureau formulated the Interim Measures for Real-name Reporting Rewards, which was officially implemented. The "Measures" stipulate that in the future, those who report violations of discipline and law by party member cadres with real names will be rewarded according to relevant regulations after verification, with a maximum reward of 200,000 yuan.
The "Measures" require that the whistleblower should tell his real name and identity, the report content is true, and the report clues can be verified. The "Measures" stipulate that anyone who reports violations of discipline and law by party organizations, party member, administrative organs, civil servants and other personnel appointed by administrative organs in real names, which is verified by verification, will be rewarded with a maximum of 5,000 yuan if the violator is punished by party discipline and political discipline; Those who recover economic losses for the state and the collective will be rewarded according to 5% of the actual amount of direct economic losses recovered, and the maximum amount of rewards will not exceed 200,000 yuan. You can't have both bonuses.
Power is endowed by the people. The people's right to supervise is natural and effective. From this point of view, the interim measures for real-name reporting rewards in Tieling City, Liaoning Province have very important practical significance. Especially when the anti-corruption task is arduous and the internal supervision is "looking at the flowers in the fog", this move is particularly commendable. However, rewarding whistleblowers is nothing new. I have tried some places before, but often for various reasons, I finally failed. Rationally speaking, in the real environment, there are many things more important than rewarding informants that need to be considered by relevant departments.
First of all, how to protect the information security and personal safety of the whistleblower and how to ensure that the whistleblower is not known by the whistleblower is an extremely important matter that cannot be ignored. Now many people are afraid to report their names for fear of being "harmonious" and being retaliated. Numerous facts have proved that real-name reporting is a risky and quite risky behavior. Therefore, in real life, real-name reporting is often an "impulsive" move after being forced to do so.
Secondly, how do the Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Municipal Supervision Bureau handle the "information" received after receiving the report? Are they perfunctory or start an investigation? Is it shirking responsibility, or dare to grasp and manage? Is it a tip-off for revenge, or just for law enforcement? These are all very important core issues. How to ensure that every report can be solved truthfully is a difficult point that needs to be overcome at present.
Finally, on the basis of all the work, it is also a problem to consider whether the results of a period of time can be made public.