First of all, the conclusion is that there are many colleges and universities in Xi 'an, but the corresponding industries have not been fully developed and have become a talent export city. Moreover, due to the poor regional development, compared with Wuhan and Nanjing, which are both talent export cities, the problem is more prominent.
We regard the number of students in colleges and universities as a talent pool, and GDP represents the goal of talent flow. Let's first look at the number of students in colleges and universities, and then look at the talent training in various cities.
The largest number of people are Wuhan and Guangzhou. Considering that Shenzhen is a young city and there are not many colleges and universities, we can look at Guangzhou and Shenzhen together. As can be seen from the figure, Wuhan, Xi, Chengdu, Nanjing, Jinan, Zhengzhou, Chongqing and Beijing have more talents. It happens to be the central city of each region. Then let's take a look at the development of each city and compare the GDP of the city in the picture.
The horizontal axis is the number of college students in turn, and the vertical axis is the GDP output value. This picture only shows the GDP gap in different places. If you divide by the number of local students, you will get the following picture.
Obviously, Shanghai and Beijing are obvious talent input cities, with few students but developed economies, so many people will naturally enter. Nanchang, Xi, Jinan, Zhengzhou, Wuhan and Nanjing will suffer great losses. Assuming that the local employment of urban graduates is not mobile and GDP represents the total wages, then Beijing is six times that of Xi and Shanghai is eight times that of Xi. If we look at the ratio of students to the total population,
Among them, Changsha belongs to the average level, while Wuhan, Jinan, Nanjing, Nanchang and Xi 'an belong to cities with relatively high proportion of college students. Among the twelve major cities of higher education mentioned, Shanghai and Beijing are typical cities of talent input, while Guangzhou is a city with more talent output. Changsha is a standard city, which is balanced in all aspects and has no obvious talent flow. Zhengzhou has a large population, and there are talents flowing, but the performance is not obvious; Chengdu and Chongqing have developed well, and the flow of talents exists, but it is not prominent; Nanchang's status is not high, GDP is not high, and there are not many famous schools, which shows that the flow of talents is not noticeable; The brain drain in Wuhan, Xi, Nanjing and Jinan is obvious, especially in Xi. In fact, the problem in Nanchang is more serious than that in Xi. However, due to the geographical location, Nanchang was suppressed by Wuhan, and there were no famous schools for historical reasons, so people did not pay attention to Wuhan, Nanjing and Jinan, which correspond to Hubei, Shandong and Jiangsu provinces respectively, and at the same time attract students from around, so there are many universities, although the number of students in Wuhan ranks first in the country. However, the economy is better than Nanjing and Jinan, and the loss is not obvious, while Xi 'an's GDP is only half that of Wuhan, which is a serious problem. Look at the GDP data of each region and take four regions: northwest, southwest, central China and northeast China.
The development of the northwest itself is not good and balanced. The GDP of Xi 'an is basically equivalent to the sum of the four provincial capitals, and it is also located in Chengdu in the southwest, but Chengdu and Wuhan are twice as big as Xi 'an. Therefore, Xi 'an was labeled as an economically underdeveloped talent. Considering the brain drain in university employment, let's look at the inflow and outflow of talents in Xi. Are there fewer and fewer talents in Xi? The following picture shows the employment flow of Xi Jiaotong University 20 12, and the proportion of graduate students staying in Shaanxi is higher.
In 20 14, Xi jiaotong university enrolled 980 students in Shaanxi province and 3222 students nationwide. In fact, the proportion of local students entering and leaving the school is basically the same. Other schools consider that there should be more local students, and there is basically no tendency to go out to work hard. It can be said that Xi 'an attracts a lot of talents, but it is much less than the number of high school students who are attracted to study. Therefore, it is understandable that Xi 'an itself attracted many students from the beginning, but when it came to employment, all of them were lost. In fact, Xi 'an has trained a considerable number of talents in this area, and also trained a large number of talents who have gone to other areas. In other words, the question itself should be why Xi 'an lost a large number of talents trained in this city. From the perspective of talents in this region, it is basically like this. Finally, the talents in colleges and universities are actually related to economic strength. For example, the number of college students in Shanghai is not as large as that in Nanchang, but the economic strength of the city itself has promoted the development of colleges and universities in this region. Beijing has also become the national higher education center for policy reasons, instead of Wuhan, which has the largest number of colleges and universities. This can also be seen from the development history of the two exchanges. As a talent pool, colleges and universities themselves can also promote regional economic development. Unfortunately, due to the slow development of the provinces in the region, the tertiary industry in Xi 'an cannot develop, and the implementation of government policies is not as good as that in Chengdu in the southwest, leaving a large number of local data sources for training talents: China National Bureau of Statistics, Xi Jiaotong University Undergraduate Admissions Network and Xi Jiaotong University Employment.