First, straighten your mind.
A good attitude is often the key to success, and a peaceful attitude can take you out of adversity and turn defeat into victory. You must not have the idea of rushing for success, because it will only make you fidgety and unable to review quietly. For mathematics, first of all, you should fully realize the importance of taking part in the postgraduate entrance examination. There is a popular saying in the postgraduate entrance examination: those who get mathematics get the world. The math score is 150, which is self-evident.
Mathematics foundation is very important, but don't think that you can definitely take the postgraduate entrance examination if you get 90 points in the final exam. This is the most fatal mistake. But don't be discouraged because you didn't learn well before. In recent years, the math test questions are exquisite but not complicated. As long as you can prepare carefully, you will certainly achieve ideal results. Postgraduate entrance examination is a long and short process. After comprehensive review, we must find our own weaknesses and then prescribe the right medicine. Correction must be overkill, and only by severely burning the weak points can the ideal effect be achieved.
Second, the correct choice of materials.
Now the postgraduate entrance examination market is hot, and all kinds of materials are available. I'm afraid it means "nothing unexpected, nothing can't be found". Mathematics materials are overwhelming, so readers must carefully select several books suitable for their own review methods. These textbooks will often help you get twice the result with half the effort. I have chosen the following textbooks: The Complete Book of Mathematics Standards for Postgraduate Entrance Examination, Analysis of Mathematics True Questions for Postgraduate Entrance Examination over the Years, and Li Yongle Classic 400 Questions.
I think math review can go through three rounds: the book of math standards for postgraduate entrance examination, which is used to review knowledge points in the early stage of postgraduate entrance examination. The book is very large and comprehensive, and almost all the knowledge points are summarized in it. At the same time, there are exercises in related chapters above, which can be used for after-class training and also for checking and filling the gaps in knowledge points during the final sprint. Review all the knowledge points in the first round. Don't ask for everything, at least have an impression.
If you want to test your mastery after the first round of review, the best way is to do the real questions over the years. The real question is the crystallization of experts' wisdom and the most valuable information for us to grasp the direction of the proposition. Therefore, the simulation questions can be done less, but the real questions must be done several times before they can set foot on the examination room. Mr. Wu's book contains the questions of the same knowledge in one chapter, and two tables indicate the examination year and score one by one, with a clear horizontal contrast and a clear focus. When you do real questions, you must overcome the problems you do for the sake of doing them, and you must understand the knowledge points thoroughly. It is useless to focus on quantity blindly. If possible, please think about new ways to solve the problem yourself. If you do this several times, your mathematical thinking will be consolidated.
In the third round, we need to practice a lot of simulation questions when we enter the sprint stage. My suggestion is that you can find a set of difficult questions, which can sound the alarm and remind yourself that there are still quite a few knowledge points that have not been mastered clearly, so you should check for leaks and fill gaps as soon as possible. Li Yongle's Classic 400 Questions is a very good set of simulation questions, which are more difficult than formal questions, but the knowledge points are accurately grasped and there are no questions beyond the outline. It should be the same as entering the examination room. Set an alarm clock and stop writing as soon as it rings. It will be beneficial and harmless to practice a few more times.
In the process of three rounds of review, it is necessary to extract wrong knowledge points and wrong questions in time, and make notes and analysis. Wrong questions are precious wealth. It is necessary to analyze where you are wrong, whether you have no ideas or simple methods, whether you are too hasty or your knowledge is vague. These should be carefully written down to ensure that similar mistakes will not be made again next time. Turn over the simulation questions several times before doing it, so that reducing such mistakes becomes a natural feeling. If you integrate into the process of doing the questions, you will make progress over time.
Third, proper counseling.
Going to the remedial class is a chore. We should get up early to catch the bus, at the same time, we should be quick-thinking, and record the course notes in detail and comprehensively, which makes people tired and easy to have anticlimactic thoughts. I suggest that if you choose to take remedial classes, don't have the idea of letting others do it for you. No matter how well you remember other people's notes, there must be marks that you can understand. In addition, some knowledge points are not easy to master without the teacher's explanation. No matter how tired the remedial class is, it will only take a week. Think about the happiness of getting high marks, and this pain is naturally nothing.
There is also great pressure to take notes in class. Not all the words written by the teacher on the blackboard are copied down intact, and the key words spoken by the teacher cannot be let go. Write it down with pens of different colors for easy digestion and absorption after class. It should also be noted that the solution of different conditions for the same knowledge point often leads to completely different results. If you don't understand at the moment, you must ask the teacher after class. Students who ask questions are unlikely to refuse. It is useless not to digest and absorb notes after class. The teacher's method is also the conclusion he has drawn through hardships. Unless you turn it into something you can use, you can't reach the state of being handy. For example, there are several ways to find the limit. See if you can choose the right method to solve related problems quickly and accurately. If the answer is yes, then your basic skills are almost the same.
Finally, we should understand that the purpose of attending remedial classes is to improve the speed of solving problems and master the correct methods, which complement each other. Mathematical ability is improved through continuous summary and mastery. Teachers have good methods, but you can also have unique solutions. Different teachers have different solutions. You can solve a problem in different ways, and choose the simplest and easiest way to solve it.
From my personal experience, if you do the above, your math will definitely be greatly improved. I wish the 20 15 postgraduate entrance examination success!