Hello, my friend, this debate is very classic. We can start with the breakthrough of people-oriented in the current society. Then give examples, such as Yao Jiaxin and Ma Jiajue, which are representative examples. To be a talented person, you must be an adult first. This is a classic. We were also anti-party at that time. We made it. I wish you success! Feel free to discuss with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your adoption. Follow-up: Thank you! I need classic opening remarks, such as some powerful proverbs or wise sayings, to show that it is more important for college students to shape their personality than to accumulate knowledge! Answer: Well, I know what you mean. In the opening theory, we can directly take Yao Jiaxin as an example to highlight our own views. Another example is the soul. A civil servant who recently graduated from Peking University can also be used as an example of beating his parents. It's all classic. It is more important to highlight one's own views and shape the personality of college students. Supplement: Personality shaping of college students refers to the process of perfecting personality on the basis of certain personality. The knowledge accumulation of college students means that college students have a deeper and broader understanding of knowledge, and it is a process in which knowledge gradually gathers to the surface of human brain. In the social reality, college students selected after the college entrance examination will inevitably become the middle force of society, so the growth of college students should closely meet the needs of society. At present, the social reality determines the orientation requirements of the society for the growth mode of college students, determines the growth mode that college students should carry out, and determines whether college students should pay more attention to knowledge accumulation or personality shaping, which is more in line with the growth mode of college students and the needs of society. On the contrary, which is more conducive to the realization of college students' life value and social value? Based on this appropriate standard, let's take a look at today's debate. I want to reach an understanding with each other first, that is, what college students pay more attention to will develop in a good direction. With this hypothesis, let me discuss our views below. First of all, let's look at the theme of today's debate, college students. College students are heroes who cross the single-plank bridge of the college entrance examination. The exam-oriented education before the college entrance examination allows students to focus most of their energy on knowledge accumulation. For students with limited energy, due to the lack of full contact with society, the personality cultivation in the early stage of cognitive ability formation is weakened. Secondly, the ultimate goal of students is to step into the society and realize their personal life value, but today's society is in a stage of rapid development. Although the per capita quality has been significantly improved compared with that of the founding of the People's Republic of China, at the same time, the problem that cannot be ignored is that there is still a big gap in people's quality level. The contradiction between high and low quality just shows the real existence of great differences between people, and also shows that the moral environment of our society is a mixed environment, which is obviously not suitable for personality shaping. Then college students are now in the golden age of personality shaping. Only by paying more attention to personality shaping can we internalize our accumulated knowledge, improve our comprehensive quality, better adapt to social development and realize cognitive and social values. Finally, from this practical process, the shaping of personality needs positive guidance, and the sub-social environment in which college students live, as a semi-closed form, provides a better development environment for college students' personality shaping that is easier and more realistic than today's society. Society needs qualified college students, but in this critical period of personality shaping, society can't provide college students with an environment superior to that of universities, and personality shaping is far from knowledge accumulation relative to the target level of social construction. Therefore, this contradiction determines that we must pay more attention to personality shaping in universities. Only in this way can we better form personal personality, which is also the premise for college students to better realize their personal values. Of course, we do not deny the importance of knowledge accumulation, but through the analysis of the above three points. We insist that college students should pay more attention to personality shaping.