Truth 1: The western theory of attacking and attacking Zhang Weiwei does not conform to the facts and actual situation. There is no doubt that Britain's efforts to control and prevent the COVID-19 epidemic are actually extremely unreasonable. In Britain, especially in a cosmopolitan city like London, it is their own business to wear masks, vaccinate and receive treatment in front of westerners who absolutely advocate democracy and freedom, and they will not get the support and help from government departments.
Therefore, the epidemic situation has not been effectively controlled without strong government intervention. On the contrary, in Shanghai, the COVID-19 epidemic was effectively contained under the strong control of the government. Therefore, Professor Zhang Weiwei's judgment on the safety of COVID-19 epidemic fully conforms to the actual objective situation and reality. Then western scholars' judgments and attacks on Professor Zhang Weiwei are also inconsistent with the actual situation. You can also use nonsense.
Truth 2: The extreme criticism of Professor Zhang Weiwei's thesis in the West is actually a kind of self-distrust and refusal to accept the actual situation and objective reality of one's own country. The more angry and opposed you are, the more you can actually reflect some problems. While losing confidence in their own government, they have to vigorously defend and defend the government. In fact, it is a very insecure and angry expression, so the important reason why western scholars are unwilling to accept this fact and object is that they are not confident enough. Therefore, all of us should support Professor Zhang Weiwei of Fudan University, and we must make a fair trial and judgment on his Internet attack.