The aura of Peking University, the champion of the college entrance examination, has a sense of superiority written on her face. In an interview backstage, she bluntly said, "I really don't want to win the first prize because I have won it too many times, which is boring." I really want to experience the feeling of failure. "

What arrogance this is! I gave Liu Chunyi a lot of shots in the process of going through the door. Angry player Amy's sister felt the fierce gunfire. Although it is not polite, as an egalitarian, I am still full of expectations for Liu Neng's voice for women. After all, "Sharp" is more interesting, which is in line with the program style that Qi Yuan said.

Before arriving at the five tutors, Liu started with "I am a student of Peking University, the no.1 in the college entrance examination", showing a sense of superiority. Before starting the debate, he specifically said that the instructors explained what "involution" was. In the backstage interview, he said, "I'm afraid the instructors don't understand". I can't use the word "sharp" to wash her white, and her emotional intelligence is really low.

Then there is the boring and dry "involution" interpretation, and the instructors are all confused. The host had to interrupt her and guide her to express what kind of person she is in order to convince her mentor to win "happy fans", but the girl was really persistent and returned to her boring "inner tumbling" and replied: "I am a person who has been tumbling, and now I don't want to roll again."

The tutor is still very tolerant of young people, but in the back-and-forth dialogue, Liu did not answer any questions of the tutor, but questioned and denied the tutor's questions in various words. Finally, the host said helplessly, "Liu is a lever." In just a few minutes, the champion of the city college entrance examination, who was full of superiority, left Taiwan Province without a "happy fan".

Any field has involution. From the perspective of pedagogy, it is popular to interpret involution. When children go to school, they can go to Peking University with 600 points. Later, a child scored high in the remedial class, forcing everyone to go to the remedial class. The final ranking remains unchanged. A fixed proportion of people go to Peking University, but students are more tired, parents spend more money, but people who run remedial classes earn money.

Liu is obviously a victim of involution and a promoter at the same time. When asked about the number one in the college entrance examination, she replied that she was the number one in the city. I was shocked, too. This sense of superiority overflowed the screen, and I acquiesced that she must be a top student in the province. She also said that in the whirlpool of "involution", the teacher once said that "a few more points is the provincial champion."

Liu felt that someone was "crushing" her, but as the tutor said, the person who was "crushed" was not others, but himself. Liu is deeply involved in the "volume" and immersed in it, but worried about it. As the tutor said, the problem is too real and the solution is too simple.

In all previous educational viewpoints, if I divide it simply and rudely, I can also be regarded as a "rolling school", such as high school vs vocational high school, famous school vs junior college, stocking vs "chicken baby", and whether to buy a school district, I advocate rolling.

I don't think there is anything wrong with "unpacking" itself. As a member of human society, if you don't "roll", the result will come out. If the volume reaches a certain level, you can influence and change the "volume"