In fact, this method has been used by teachers in the past. I heard about this teaching method myself when I was in college. In other words, at least in the 1980s, some teachers used this teaching method.
There are advantages and disadvantages for students to attend classes. So although it was adopted by teachers, it did not become the main teaching method. The main teaching method has always been teaching method, and now this method is called "traditional teaching method". In fact, the traditional teaching methods are also diversified.
Of course, compared with teachers' lectures, students' lectures have natural shortcomings, that is, students' lack of knowledge and poor professional grasp ability, which is inevitable and will affect the depth of teaching. This is why students usually use lectures as an auxiliary method of teaching.
It can be seen that as parents, they should cooperate with teachers to complete teaching tasks. As the saying goes, interlacing is like a mountain. It may be wise for teachers to master how to teach (unless you really know how to teach) and respect their teaching activities.
If there is such a teacher, this teacher must be unusual. See things all the time. The whole process of learning, the whole process of teaching. Students preview part, lecture part, summary part, exercise part, homework review exercise preview part. The first two paragraphs are studying at home, and the middle three paragraphs are three short paragraphs of classroom learning. Students say that students verify their self-study at home, evaluate their abilities and find the direction of their efforts. The teacher's task is to make up the knowledge that students missed, and guide them how to preview, do homework, review and practice at home, so as to prepare for the next day's study. This kind of classroom is better than anyone who studies by himself. This class once existed. It can be said that it is the best teaching design and the best classroom protagonist for students. Become the master of learning. Students are blessed with such teachers. Teachers teach for the sake of not teaching.
Teachers don't give lectures, so it's certainly unreasonable for students to speak.
Because lecturing is the glorious duty of a people's teacher, if a teacher doesn't speak, how can we understand the sentence that a teacher preaches and teaches to solve doubts?
Lecture is the key link for students to acquire knowledge, and the key points and difficulties of knowledge will be reflected in the lecture. If the teacher doesn't talk, students are not sure about the key points and difficulties, which will inevitably affect their academic performance.
Of course, if teachers want to cultivate students' ability, it is understandable to let students speak on stage once or twice occasionally.
The above is just a personal opinion.
If in a class, the teacher doesn't lecture, let the students lecture, and often do so, this is definitely wrong.
The classroom teaching mode embodies the teaching concept.
Our classroom teaching is not static. Older people are familiar with the previous teaching model. The basic steps are to organize teaching and introduce new courses. Review old lessons; Explain the new lesson; Consolidate exercises; Assign homework. This is the teaching theory of the former Soviet educator Kailov. After the new curriculum reform, our teaching concept has changed, emphasizing the student-oriented teaching concept.
Student-oriented classroom is to put students first, and teachers are helpers and guides. Who is studying in the classroom? How to learn? To what extent have you learned? Wait a series of questions. It is clear that students should give more play to their subjective initiative in learning, so there are links of students' preview, display and group cooperation.
But there is no rule that teachers should not give lectures and let students give lectures. If the teacher doesn't give lectures, the teacher's demonstration and leading role will be gone, the teacher's inspiring explanation will be gone, and the students' thinking ability will not be improved.
In the process of classroom learning, students need to communicate and ask questions to complement each other.
In the process of classroom learning, individual students need to communicate their own thinking process with everyone on the blackboard, thus causing other students to think or question further. This is the need of classroom teaching, not that teachers don't talk to students.
The process of a student showing his own thinking is the process of colliding with others' thinking. During this period, we need to question, supplement and demonstrate.
Students' statements and exchanges can be made not only on the blackboard, but also between two students at the next table or in student groups. Teachers should participate in this process, master the rhythm and ensure that the theme is prominent.
The implementation of classroom teaching reform should be made clear to students and parents in advance, and the purpose, significance and steps should not be rushed.
Any reform of the school must be fully demonstrated, and students, teachers and parents should know the ins and outs, otherwise it will be misunderstood, there will be resistance, and some will give up halfway. The problem in the problem is a typical misunderstanding of classroom teaching reform.
It is necessary to do a good job in relevant training, do a good job in pilot demonstration, and then promote it in due course.
The teaching method of "the teacher doesn't lecture, let the students talk" is not new. Many teachers have been doing this for a long time.
"Is it reasonable"? Let me talk about a clear, six main rationality.
Make it clear: the teacher doesn't lecture, let the students speak. It's not that the teacher really doesn't speak at all, but that the students are consciously and selectively allowed to speak.
Rationality:
1, turn the traditional teaching of teachers into an open classroom in which students actively participate, and turn boring into liveliness;
2. Students learn knowledge passively and clearly, and explain knowledge actively and clearly, which can make students in ta understand that the former is learning and the latter is teaching, and the two are not in the same quantity at all: passive learning is rigid and active learning is creation;
3. Let students understand the context of knowledge more comprehensively, and at the same time exercise their courage, self-confidence and oral language skills.
4. Let the whole class feel fresh when listening to the class, understand the advantages and disadvantages of others and how to learn and speak, so as to improve themselves.
6. Reasonable lectures can be given by key students or by students in turn.
These six points are the main meaning of "teachers don't lecture, let students talk".
The situation of education and teaching is developing rapidly, and teachers' new thinking and new means are not the practices of the previous era. Take the problem as an example. The teacher doesn't lecture, but lets the students speak. When asking such questions, should the questioner praise the teacher's innovation or accuse the teacher of laziness?
In the past, some students took the lead in reading, some students performed on stage, and some students checked the teacher's homework, but it was really not that students gave lectures to all students alone. Don't say it if it's reasonable or unreasonable. Never experienced it at all.
It is normal for students to play the role of teachers themselves. If it is the teacher's laziness and inaction that brings students to the classroom to perfunctory things, such a teacher is dereliction of duty.
Teachers should give lectures and students should listen to lectures. The giver and the receiver can never put the cart before the horse. On this issue, let's talk about this point first. Forgive my inappropriateness!
Reasonable. Students' attending classes is a manifestation of independent cooperation and inquiry learning, and it is the reform and innovation of learning methods and teaching methods, which is of progressive significance.
Your so-called "teachers don't talk" is not objective. The teacher may talk less, but he won't talk.
It is not enough to "the teacher doesn't lecture", but "let the students talk" can't be generalized, it depends on what is taught. "Let students talk" is a strategy and wisdom of teachers' teaching.
First, teachers don't give lectures, and the teaching strategy of "let students talk" is mostly suitable for review and homework evaluation. Except for Chinese, other subjects are not suitable for new teaching. 1. New teaching means having new knowledge points to teach and new abilities to cultivate. If students speak, there will be more disadvantages. Such as: unclear, incomplete, even wrong, incoherent, can not be flexibly applied to practice and so on. Teachers should emphasize again that teaching time and progress are delayed. Besides, everyone has preconceived ideas. If students make mistakes, they will mislead other students and it is more difficult for teachers to correct them.
Therefore, it is better for a new teacher.
2. Review class is different from homework evaluation class. The teacher has made clear the key points of new knowledge points and new ability training. The key and difficult points are all equipped with appropriate training to strengthen and break through, and most students understand. However, understanding does not mean being able to use it, and being able to use it temporarily does not mean being able to use it forever. Using students to lecture can help students deepen their understanding of new knowledge and increase their proficiency in new abilities, so that teachers can find out what students have mastered well and what students have not mastered well. From the concept of the new curriculum standard, "student theory" can also arouse students' enthusiasm for classroom participation, stimulate their interest in learning, and cultivate their oral expression ability, thus highlighting students' dominant position in learning.
Second, what problems should be paid attention to when adopting the strategy of "students speak"? 1. Teachers should carefully plan and take "students' speaking" as part of their own teaching, instead of giving all classes to students.
For example, I used the teaching strategy of "students talk" when I taught "Listening to Books in Minghuju". Because an important knowledge point of this article is to learn to express sounds with synaesthesia. After reading through the text, I will first talk about the characteristics that sound is felt and invisible by auditory organs, and then give examples to illustrate the characteristics that human sensory organs are interlinked. After the students understand synaesthesia, they will explain in turn how to express Wang Xiaoyu's voice in the part of "Wang Xiaoyu telling stories". The effect is very good: first, not only the students who participate in the explanation are very attentive, but also the students who attend the class are very attentive, because they should be able to hear the mistakes made by their classmates; Second, students can use some methods flexibly where they need to write sounds in later writing.
2. Teachers should carefully guide students to "prepare lessons". For example, in the last class, after the students were divided into groups, the teacher should quickly participate in each group and guide them how to explain. Such as content selection, decision selection, sequence arrangement, etc. All the explanations are exquisite.
3. After the students speak, teachers should summarize and evaluate in time. One is the evaluation of students' explaining knowledge points, and the other is the evaluation of students' explaining strategies.
4. Teachers should arrange students to participate in lectures reasonably. Don't let those students talk every time. After a long time, most students can't get exercise, and students will lose interest in such teachers, such classes and such subjects, and the effect will be counterproductive. Don't engage in egalitarianism, let every student participate in the explanation. If the students in the class are excellent, egalitarianism is necessary; If the grades and abilities of students in the class are uneven, how can those temporary underachievers make it clear? Therefore, according to the actual situation of the classroom, it is the purpose to use the strategy of "students' speaking" reasonably to improve students' interest and ability and make our classroom more dynamic.
5. Teachers should reasonably arrange the time proportion of "students speaking". Don't arrange "student lectures" for the whole class. Personally, it is appropriate to spend less than one third of a class "speaking by students".
In this way, using the strategy of "students speak" is not the laziness of teachers, but the wisdom of teachers' teaching.
Reasonable, diverse teaching methods, trying new methods, the effect is good.
Your question should be analyzed in detail:
First, teachers neglect their duties and let students give lectures instead of themselves.
This situation is absolutely not allowed! Teaching and educating people is a teacher's duty. The state pays salaries, teachers complete tasks and impart relevant knowledge to students through teaching. This is the duty! If you don't teach yourself, it is against the laws and regulations to let students take the exam instead. I remember a classmate said that in the 1980s, when he was in high school, there was a math teacher. Because of his low level of knowledge, he can't speak math at all, so he often asks students with good math scores to take his place in class. Soon, the teacher was transferred from his teaching post to work in the logistics department. But up to now, all the teachers who have been admitted to the formal establishment have graduated from college, and this situation of not being able to speak should be basically gone.
Secondly, it is a teaching method for teachers to train students.
If so, it is absolutely possible! We say that no matter how well a student learns in class, it is better to let him stand on the platform and give an impressive speech to the whole class. Because, in this way, students are not only talking about knowledge, but also about their psychological growth after the role change. I remember when I was a class teacher of grade 20 12, I often asked the classmate who was the best in mathematics in the class to use the evening self-study time to "teach" the whole class! This not only allowed him to exercise himself, but also mobilized the enthusiasm of the whole class in this way, and the effect was quite good!